George M. McBride:
The Haciendas of Mexico are the most conspicuous feature of the land system of the
country. They give to agricultural Mexico its distinctive cast, and, by their great size,
create the impression that the entire land is divided into vast rural estates. These
properties, indeed, are the only type of agricultural holding immediately visible to the
traveler in many parts of Mexico, just as the hacendado is the only type of
agriculturist whose interest reach beyond the immediate neighborhood of his home. . Many
of the haciendas are of very great extent; it is estimated that 300 of them contain at
least 25,000 acres each...The Mexican hacienda seldom contains less than 2,500
acres--whether situated in the arid plains of the north, where land is worth little or
nothing, or in the densely settled areas of the Mesa Central.
The haciendas are settlements complete in themselves. Indeed, few of these estates have
less than a hundred, while many of them have as many as a thousand inhabitants. . .
Furthermore, the haciendas are all named; they appear on the maps; and they are important
units of public administration, often being incorporated as municipios. They
include all the customary accessories of an independent community, such as a church, a
store, a post office, a burying ground, and sometimes a school or hospital. Workshops are
maintained, not only for the repair but even for the manufacture of machinery and of the
numerous implements on the estate. The permanent population consists of an administrador,
one or more majordomos, a group of foremen, and the regular peons, together with the
families of these individuals. Besides these, there are several classes of hangers-on,
less permanently attached to the farm. Among the latter are usually a priest or two,
clerks, accountants, storekeepers, hired shepherds and cattlemen, and often a number of
families who rent small pieces of land from the hacienda. Over this aggregation the owner
presides in a more or less patriarchal manner, the degree of paternal care or of tyranny
varying with the character of the individual and with that of his superior employees.
The typical Mexican landowner spends relatively little of his time within this citadel
[his house]. He usually maintains a residence in the capital or some other large city,
where he spends the greater part of the year. If the income of his property makes it
possible, he may go to Europe or the United States. Only during the most active
seasons--planting or harvesting--does he long remain on his estate....The hacendado is,
therefore, less an agriculturist than a landowner, less a farmer than an absentee
landlord, and his interest in the property is due less to its economic possibilities than
to its character as an ancestral estate.
The laborers on the haciendas, in most parts of Mexico, are of Indian blood or are
mestizos in whom the Indian element predominates. . . The peons upon a Mexican hacienda
are theoretically free...As a matter of fact, however, many of them are held upon the
estate in bondage no less real because it is sanctioned only by custom and enforced only
by economic conditions. . . By a system of advance payments, which the peons are totally
unable to refund, the hacendados are able to keep them permanently under financial
obligations and hence to oblige them to remain upon the estates to which they belonged. .
. The daily wages paid to the peons who work on the haciendas have always been very
low....seldom paid in money. Ordinarily for his labor he is given a due bill or time check
to be negotiated at the store maintained by the hacienda--with obvious results. On the
other hand, the actual wage earned is not the only compensation that the peon receives.
Certain perquisites, if one might so describe them, have been established by custom, which
alleviate the lot of the Indian laborer. Thus he occupies a hut upon the estate without
being called upon to pay rent. He is usually allowed a milpa, a piece of land for
his own use, and this may provide at least a part of his living. Moreover, while he is
forced to resort to the hacienda store, he enjoys a credit there sufficient to tide him
over in the event of a general crop failure. Actually, however, so meager is the
compensation received by the peon that he is kept in the most abject poverty, and few
opportunities of escape from the bondage imposed by the established system ever present
themselves. Obviously, this situation has greatly encouraged the emigration of rural
laborers from Mexico to the southwestern part of the United States. Official figures given
by the U. S. Bureau of Immigration show that between 1899 and 1919 there was an average
yearly movement of 10,320 immigrants from Mexico into this country, in addition to the
seasonal migration. These figures are thought to represent only a part of the actual
movement, since conditions on the border make it easy for the immigrant to avoid
registration. The full tide of emigration of Mexican laborers is thought by some to reach
as high as 100,000 a year.
In the eyes of the Mexicans the value of an hacienda does not lie in the money return
yielded by the annual crops. The actual return in money is often very small. With
intensive cultivation the broad acres might be made to yield a large income; but, with an
absentee owner, a hired administrator, and poorly paid peons, the typical Mexican hacienda
yields little more than enough to feed its numerous population. The economic value to the
owner lies rather in the supplies which it furnishes, the cheap service which it provides
for his household, and the amount of money which he can obtain on a mortgage. . . . The
haciendas and their owners have, in most respects, dominated the life of Mexico. This
domination is less economic than social or political. Opinions differ as to the proportion
of the nation=s food supply that is derived from
the haciendas and from the smaller properties. Statistics that would settle the question
have, apparently, never been compiled; but even if the smaller farms supply the greater
part of the food for public consumption, it is the haciendas, with their greater ability
to hold their produce for a favorable price, that control the markets. In matters of wages
and conditions of work the haciendas also exert a determining influence. The social and
political influence is more direct and powerful. Throughout the history of Mexico the
landholding class has generally dominated social conditions. It has set the standards of
morals, education, and amusement for the middle class and has determined the conditions
under which the manual laborer must live. Moreover, the great landowners have ruled the
country. This small class, numbering 8,000 to 10,000 proprietors, has at all times
exercised a preponderant influence in national affairs and has usually been in control in
individual states. In the colonial period their influence constantly thwarted the
benevolent measures of the home government; and since the birth of the republic
legislation has been dictated by them, and largely in their interests, or, in
revolutionary times, have usually succeeded in controlling the enforcement of the laws.
Source
From: George M. McBride, The Land Systems of Mexico, (New York: American
Geographical Society, 1923), passimScanned by: J. S. Arkenberg, Dept. of History, Cal. State Fullerton.
This text is part of the Internet
Modern History Sourcebook. The Sourcebook is a collection of public domain and
copy-permitted texts for introductory level classes in modern European and World history.
Unless otherwise indicated the specific electronic form of the document is copyright.
Permission is granted for electronic copying, distribution in print form for educational
purposes and personal use. If you do reduplicate the document, indicate the source. No
permission is granted for commercial use of the Sourcebook.
© Paul Halsall, July 1998
