Medieval Sourcebook:
Twelfth Ecumenical Council:
Lateran IV 1215
The Canons of the Fourth Lateran Council, 1215
CANON 1
Text: We firmly believe and openly confess that there is
only one true God, eternal and immense, omnipotent, unchangeable,
incomprehensible, and ineffable, Father, Son, and Holy Ghost;
three Persons indeed but one essense, substance, or nature absolutely
simple; the Father (proceeding) from no one, but the Son from
the Father only, and the Holy Ghost equally from both, always
without beginning and end. The Father begetting, the Son begotten,
and the Holy Ghost proceeding; consubstantial and coequal, co-omnipotent
and coeternal, the one principle of the universe, Creator of all
things invisible and visible, spiritual and corporeal, who from
the beginning of time and by His omnipotent power made from nothing
creatures both spiritual and corporeal, angelic, namely, and mundane,
and then human, as it were, common, composed of spirit and body.
The devil and the other demons were indeed created by God good
by nature but they became bad through themselves; man, however,
sinned at the suggestion of the devil. This Holy Trinity in its
common essense undivided and in personal properties divided, through
Moses, the holy prophets, and other servants gave to the human
race at the most opportune intervals of time the doctrine of salvation.
And finally, Jesus Christ, the only begotten Son of God made flesh
by the entire Trinity, conceived with the co-operation of the
Holy Ghost of Mary ever Virgin, made true man, composed of a rational
soul and human flesh, one Person in two natures, pointed out more
clearly the way of life. Who according to His divinity is immortal
and impassable, according to His humanity was made passable and
mortal, suffered on the cross for the salvation of the human race,
and being dead descended into hell, rose from the dead, and ascended
into heaven. But He descended in soul, arose in flesh, and ascended
equally in both; He will come at the end of the world to judge
the living and the dead and will render to the reprobate and to
the elect according to their works. Who all shall rise with their
own bodies which they now have that they may receive according
to their merits, whether good or bad, the latter eternal punishment
with the devil, the former eternal glory with Christ.
There is one Universal Church of the faithful, outside of which
there is absolutely no salvation. In which there is the same priest
and sacrifice, Jesus Christ, whose body and blood are truly contained
in the sacrament of the altar under the forms of bread and wine;
the bread being changed (transsubstantiatio) by divine
power into the body, and the wine into the blood, so that to realize
the mystery of unity we may receive of Him what He has received
of us. And this sacrament no one can effect except the priest
who has been duly ordained in accordance with the keys of the
Church, which Jesus Christ Himself gave to the Apostles and their
successors.
But the sacrament of baptism, which by the invocation of each
Person of the Trinity, namely of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost,
is effected in water, duly conferred on children and adults in
the form prescribed by the Church by anyone whatsoever, leads
to salvation. And should anyone after the reception of baptism
have fallen into sin, by true repentance he can always be restored.
Not only virgins and those practicing chastity, but also those
united in marriage, through the right faith and through works
pleasing to God, can merit eternal salvation.
CANON 2
Text: We condemn, therefore, and reprobate the book or
tract which Abott Joachim published against Master Peter Lombard
concerning the unity or essense of the Trinity, calling him heretical
and insane because he said in his Sentences that the Father, Son,
and Holy Ghost are some supreme entity in which there is no begetting,
no begotten, and no proceeding. Whence he asserts that he (Peter
Lombard) attributed to God not so much a trinity as a quaternity,
namely, three Persons and that common essense as a fourth, clearly
protesting that there is no entity that is Father, Son, and Holy
Ghost, neither is it essense or substance or nature, though he
concedes that the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost are one essense,
one substance, and one nature. But he says that such a unity is
not a true and proper (propriam) unity, but rather a collective
one or one by way of similitude, as many men are called one people
and many faithful one Church, according to the words: "The
multitude of believers had but one heart and one soul" (Acts
4: 32); and, "He who is joined to the Lord, is one spirit"
(I Cor. 6: I7); similarly, "He that planteth and he that
watereth, are one" (I Cor- 3: 8); and, "So we being
many, are one body in Christ" (Rom. 12: 5). Again in the
Book of Kings (Ruth): "My people and thy people are one"
(Ruth I: i6). To strengthen this teaching he cites that most important
word which Christ spoke concerning the faithful in the Gospel:
will, Father, that they may be one, as we also are one, that they
may be made perfect in one" (John I7: 22 f.). For the faithful
of Christ, he says, are not one in the sense that they are some
one thing that is common to all, but in the sense that they constitute
one Church by reason of the unity of the Catholic faith and one
kingdom by reason of the union of indissoluble charity, as we
read in the canonical Epistle of St. John: "There are three
who give testimony in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy
Ghost; nd these three are one" (I John 5: 7). And immediately
it is added: "And there are three who give testimony on earth,
the spirit, the water, and the blood; and these three are one"
(I John 5: 8), as it is found in some codices.
But we, with the approval of the holy and general council, believe
and confess with Peter (Lombard) that there is one supreme entity,
incomprehensible and ineffable, which is truly Father, Son, and
Holy Ghost, together (simul) three persons and each one of them
singly. And thus in God there is only trinity, not quaternity,
because each of the three persons is that entity, namely, substance,
essense, or divine nature, which alone is the principle of the
universe and besides which there is no other. And that entity
is not the one begetting or the one begotten or the one proceeding,
but it is the Father who begets, the Son who is begotten, and
the Holy Ghost proceeds, in order that there may be distinctions
in the Persons who unity in the nature. Though, therefore, the
Father is one (being), and the Son is another, and the Holy Ghost
is another, yet they are not different (non tamen aliud); but
that which is the Father that is the Son and the Holy Ghost, absolutely
the same, since according to the Orthodox and Catholic faith they
are believed to be consubstantial. For the Father begetting the
Son from eternity imparted to Him His own substance, as He Himself
testifies: "That which my father hath given me, is greater
than all" (John IO: 29). And it cannot- be said that He gave
to Him a part of His substance and retained a part for Himself,
since the substance of the Father is indivisible, that is, absolutely
simple. But neither can it be said that Father in begetting transferred
His substance to the Son, as if gave it to the Son without retaining
it for Himself, otherwise He would cease to be a substance. It
is evident, therefore, that the Son in being begotten received
without any diminution the substance of the Father and thus the
Father and Son as well as the Holy Ghost proceeding from both
are the same entity. When therefore the Truth prays to the Father
for the faithful, saying: "I will that they be one in us,
even as we are one" (John 7: 22), this term "one"
is understood first for the faithful, as implying a union of charity
in grace, then for the divine persons, as implying a unity of
identity in nature; as the Truth says in another place: "Be
you perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect" (Matt. 5:
48); as if He would say more clearly: be perfect by the perfection
of grace as your heavenly Father is perfect by the perfection
of nature, namely, each in his own way, because between the Creator
and the creature there cannot be a likeness so great that the
unlikeness is not greater. If therefore anyone presume to defend
or approve the teaching of the aforesaid Joachim on this point,
let him be repressed by all as a heretic.
In this, however, we do not wish to derogate in anything from
the monastery of Flora, which Joachim himself founded, since therein
is both the regular life and salutary observance, but chiefly
because the same Joachim ordered that his writings be submitted
to us to be approved or corrected by the judgment of the Apostolic
See, dictating a letter which he subscribed with his own hand,
in which he firmly confesses that he holds that faith which the
Roman Church holds, which by the will of God is the mother and
mistress of all the faithful. We also reprobate and condemn the
perverse teaching of he impious Amaury (Almaricus, Amalricus)
de Bene, whose mind the father of lies has so darkened that his
teaching is to be regarded not so much heretical as insane.
CANON 3
Text. We excommunicate and anathematize every heresy that
raises against the holy, orthodox and Catholic faith which we
have above explained; condemning all heretics under whatever names
they may be known, for while they have different faces they are
nevertheless bound to each other by their tails, since in all
of them vanity is a common element. Those condemned, being handed
over to the secular rulers of their bailiffs, let them be abandoned,
to be punished with due justice, clerics being first degraded
from their orders. As to the property of the condemned, if they
are laymen, let it be confiscated; if clerics, let it be applied
to the churches from which they received revenues. But those who
are only suspected, due consideration being given to the nature
of the suspicion and the character of the person, unless they
prove their innocence by a proper defense, let them be anathematized
and avoided by all 1-intil they have made suitable satisfaction;
but if they have been under excommunication for one year, then
let them be condemned as heretics. Secular authorities, whatever
office they may hold, shall be admonished and induced and if necessary
compelled by ecclesiastical censure, that as they wish to be esteemed
and numbered among the faithful, so for the defense of the faith
they ought publicly to take an oath that they will strive in good
faith and to the best of their ability to exterminate in the territories
subject to their jurisdiction all heretics pointed out by the
Church; so that whenever anyone shall have assumed authority,
whether spiritual or temporal, let him be bound to confirm this
decree by oath. But if a temporal ruler, after having been requested
and admonished by the Church, should neglect to cleanse his territory
of this heretical foulness, let him be excommunicated by the metropolitan
and the other bishops of the province. If he refuses to make satisfaction
within a year, let the matter be made known to the supreme pontiff,
that he may declare the ruler's vassals absolved from their allegiance
and may offer the territory to be ruled lay Catholics, who on
the extermination of the heretics may possess it without hindrance
and preserve it in the purity of faith; the right, however, of
the chief ruler is to be respected as long as he offers no obstacle
in this matter and permits freedom of action. The same law is
to be observed in regard to those who have no chief rulers (that
is, are independent). Catholics who have girded themselves with
the cross for the extermination of the heretics, shall enjoy the
indulgences and privileges granted to those who go in defense
of the Holy Land.
We decree that those who give credence to the teachings of the
heretics, as well as those who receive, defend, and patronize
them, are excommunicated; and we firmly declare that after any
one of them has been branded with excommunication, if he has deliberately
failed to make satisfaction within a year, let him incur ipso
jure the stigma of infamy and let him not be admitted to public
offices or deliberations, and let him not take part in the election
of others to such offices or use his right to give testimony in
a court of law. Let him also be intestable, that he may not have
the free exercise of making a will, and let him be deprived of
the right of inheritance. Let no one be urged to give an account
to him in any matter, but let him be urged to give an account
to others. If perchance he be a judge, let his decisions have
no force, nor let any cause be brought to his attention. If he
be an advocate, let his assistance by no means be sought. If a
notary, let the instruments drawn up by him be considered worthless,
for, the author being condemned, let them enjoy a similar fate.
In all similar cases we command that the same be observed. If,
however, he be a cleric, let him be deposed from every office
and benefice, that the greater the fault the graver may be the
punishment inflicted.
If any refuse to avoid such after they have been ostracized by
the Church, let them be excommunicated till they have made suitable
satisfaction. Clerics shall not give the sacraments of the Church
to such pestilential people, nor shall they presume to give them
Christian burial, or to receive their alms or offerings; otherwise
they shall be deprived of their office, to which they may not
be restored without a special indult of the Apostolic See. Similarly,
all regulars, on whom also this punishment may be imposed, let
their privileges be nullified in that diocese in which they have
presumed to perpetrate such excesses.
But since some, under "the appearance of godliness, but denying
the power thereof," as the Apostle says (II Tim. 3: 5), arrogate
to themselves the authority to preach, as the same Apostle says:
"How shall they preach unless they be sent?" (Rom. 10:15),
all those prohibited or not sent, who, without the authority of
the Apostolic See or of the Catholic bishop of the locality, shall
presume to usurp the office of preaching either publicly or privately,
shall be excommunicated and unless they amend, and the sooner
the better, they shall be visited with a further suitable penalty.
We add, moreover, that every archbishop or bishop should himself
or through his archdeacon or some other suitable persons, twice
or at least once a year make the rounds of his diocese in which
report has it that heretics dwell, and there compel three or more
men of good character or, if it should be deemed advisable, the
entire neighborhood, to swear that if anyone know of the presence
there of heretics or others holding secret assemblies, or differing
from the common way of the faithful in faith and morals, they
will make them known to the bishop. The latter shall then call
together before him those accused, who, if they do not purge themselves
of the matter of which they are accused, or if after the rejection
of their error they lapse into their former wickedness, shall
be canonically punished. But if any of them by damnable obstinacy
should disapprove of the oath and should perchance be unwilling
to swear, from this very fact let them be regarded as heretics.
We wish, therefore, and in virtue of obedience strictly command,
that to carry out these instructions effectively the bishops exercise
throughout their dioceses a scrupulous vigilance if they wish
to escape canonical punishment. If from sufficient evidence it
is apparent that a bishop is negligent or remiss in cleansing
his diocese of the ferment of heretical wickedness, let him be
deposed from the episcopal office and let another, who will and
can confound heretical depravity, be substituted.
CANON 4
Summary. Those baptized by the Latins must not be rebaptized
by the Greeks.
Text. Though we wish to favor and honor the Greeks who
in our days are returning to the obedience of the Apostolic See
by permitting them to retain their customs and rites in so far
as the interests of God allow us, in those things, however, that
are a danger to souls and derogatory to ecclesiastical propriety,
we neither wish nor ought to submit to them. After the Church
of the Greeks with some of her accomplices and supporters had
severed herself from the obedience of the Apostolic See, to such
an extent did the Greeks begin hating the Latins that among other
things which they impiously committed derogatory to the Latins
was this, that when Latin priests had celebrated upon their altars,
they would not offer the sacrifice upon those altars till the
altars had first been washed, as if by this they had been defiled.
Also, those baptized by the Latins the Greeks rashly presume to
rebaptize, and even till now, as we understand, there are some
who do not hesitate to do this. Desirous, therefore, of removing
such scandal from the Church of God, and advised by the holy council,
we strictly command that they do not presume to do such things
in the future, but conform themselves as obedient children to
the Holy Roman Church, their mother, that there may be "one
fold and one shepherd." If anyone shall presume to act contrary
to this, let him be excommunicated and deposed from every office
and ecclesiastical benefice.
CANON 5
Summary. The council approves the existing order of the patriarchal
sees and affirm, three of their privileges: their bishops may
confer the pallium and may have the cross borne before them, and
appeals may be taken to them.
Text. Renewing the ancient privileges of the patriarchal
sees, we decree with the approval of the holy and ecumenical council,
that after the Roman Church, which by the will of God holds over
all others pre-eminence of ordinary power as the mother and mistress
of all the faithful, that of Constantinople shall hold first place,
that of Alexandria second, that of Antioch third, and that of
Jerusalem fourth, the dignity proper to each to be observed; so
that after their bishops have received from the Roman pontiff
the pallium, which is the distinguishing mark of the plenitude
of the pontifical office, and have taken the oath of fidelity
and obedience to him, they may also lawfully bestow the pallium
upon their suffragans, receiving from them the canonical profession
of faith for themselves, and for the Roman Church the pledge of
obedience. They may have the standard of the cross borne before
them everywhere, except in the city of Rome and wherever the supreme
pontiff or his legate wearing the insignia of Apostolic dignity
is present. In all provinces subject to their jurisdiction appeals
may be taken to them when necessary, saving the appeals directed
to the Apostolic See, which must be humbly respected.
CANON 6
SUMMARY Provincial synod, for the correction of abuses and
the enforcement of canonical enactments must be held annually.
To ensure this, reliable persons are to be appointed who will
investigate such thin as need correction.
Text. In accordance with the ancient provisions of the
holy Fathers, the metropolitans must not neglect to hold with
their suffragans the annual provincial synods. In these they should
be actuated with a genuine fear of God in correcting abuses and
reforming morals, especially the morals of the clergy, familiarizing
themselves anew with the canonical rules, particularly those that
are enacted in this general council, that they may enforce their
observance by imposing due punishment on transgressors. That this
may be done more effectively, let them appoint in each and every
diocese prudent and upright persons, who throughout the entire
year shall informally and without any jurisdiction diligently
investigate such things as need correction or reform and faithfully
present them to the metropolitan, suffragans, and others in the
following synod, so that they may give prudent consideration to
these and other matters as circumstances demand; and in reference
to those things that they decree, let them enforce observance,
publishing the decisions in the episcopal synods to be held annually
in each diocese. Whoever shall neglect to comply with this salutary
statute, let him be suspended from his office and benefits till
it shall please his superior to restore him.
CANON 7
Summary No custom or appeal shall hinder prelates from correcting
abuses and reforming the morals of their subjects. If the chapter
neglects to correct the excesses of the canons, it shall devolve
upon the bishop to do so. Prelates shall not use this statute
as means of pecuniary gain.
Text. By an irrefragable decree we ordain that prelates
make a prudent and earnest effort to correct the excesses and
reform the morals of their subjects, especially of the clergy,
lest their blood be demanded at their hands. But that they may
perform unhindered the duty of correction and reform, we decree
that no custom or apeal shall stand in the way of their efforts,
unless they shall have exceeded the form to be observed in such
cases. The abuses, however, of the canons of the cathedral church,
the correction of which has by custom belonged to the chapter,
shall, in those churches in which such a custom has hitherto prevailed,
by the advice or command of the bishop be corrected within a reasonable
time specified by the bishop. Otherwise the bishop, having in
mind the interests of God, opposition notwithstanding, shall not
delay to correct them means of ecclesiastical censure according
as the cura animarum demands. Nor shall he neglect to correct
the excesses also of the other clerics (those assisting the canons)
according as the cura animarum requires, due order, however,
being observed in all things. If the canons without a manifest
and reasonable cause, chiefly through contempt for the bishop,
discontinue divine services, the bishop may, if he wishes, celebrate
in the cathedral church, and on his complaint the metropolitan,
as delegated by us in this matter, shall so punish them with ecclesiastical
censure that for fear of a repetition of the punishment they will
not presume to do such things in the future. Let the prelates
of the churches, therefore, be diligently on their guard that
they do not convert this salutary decree into a means of personal
profit or other objectionable conduct, but let them enforce it
earnestly and faithfully if they wish to escape canonical punishment,
for in this matter the Apostolic See, on the authority of the
Lord, will be most vigilant.
CANON 8
SUMMARY: Reports of serious irregularities by prelates and
inferior clerics must be investigated bv the superior. The accused
must be given occasion to defend himself and, ii-found 'guilty,
must be punished accordingly.
Text:. How and when a prelate ought to proceed in the inquiry
and punishment of the excesses of subjects (that is, of clerics),
is clearly deduced from the authority of the New and Old Testaments,
from which the canonical decrees were afterward drawn, as we have
long since clearly pointed out and now with the approval of the
holy council confirm. For we read in the Gospel that the steward
who was accused to his master of wasting his goods, heard him
say: "How is it that I hear this of thee? Give an account
of thy stewardship, for now thou canst be steward no longer"
(Luke i6: 2). And in Genesis the Lord said: "I will go down
and see whether they have done according to the cry that is come
to me" (Gen. i8: 2i). From these authorities it is clearly
proved that not only when a subject (that is, a cleric of a lower
rank) but also when a prelate is guilty of excesses and these
should come to the ears of the superior through complaint and
report, not indeed from spiteful and slanderous persons, but from
those who are prudent and upright persons, and not only once but
often, he must in the presence of the seniors of the church carefully
inquire into the truth of such reports, so that if they prove
to be true, the guilty party may be duly punished without the
superior being both accuser and judge in the matter. But, while
this is to be observed in regard to subjects, the observance must
be stricter in reference to prelates, who are, as it were, a ,target
for the arrow. Because they cannot please all, since by their
very office they are bound not only to rebuke but also at times
to loose and bind, they frequently incur the hatred of many and
are subject to insidious attacks. The holy fathers, therefore,
wisely decreed that accusations against prelates must be accepted
with great reserve lest, the pillars being shattered, the edifice
itself fall unless proper precaution be exercised by which recourse
not only to false but also malicious incrimination is precluded.
They wished so to protect prelates that on the one hand they might
not be unjustly accused, and on the other hand that they might
be on their guard, lest they should become haughtily delinquent;
finding a suitable remedy for each disease in the provision that
a criminal accusation which calls for a diminutio capitis,
that is, degradation, is by no means to be accepted, nisi legitima
praecedat inscriptio. But when anyone shall have been accused
on account of his excesses, so that the reports and whisperings
arising therefrom cannot any longer be ignored without scandal
or tolerated without danger, then steps, inspired not by hatred
but by charity, must be taken without scruple toward an inquiry
and punishment of his excesses. If it is a question of a grave
offense, though not one that calls for a degradatio ab ordine,
the accused must be deprived absolutely of all administrative
authority, which is in accordance with the teaching of the Gospel,
namely, that the steward who cannot render a proper account of
his office as steward be deprived of his stewardship. He about
whom inquiry is to be made must be present, unless he absents
himself through stubbornness; and the matter to be investigated
must be made known to him, that he may have opportunity to defend
himself. Not only the testimony of the witnesses but also their
names must be made known to him, that he may be aware who testified
against him and what was their testimony; and finally, legitimate
exceptions and replications must be admitted, lest by the suppression
of names and by the exclusion of exceptions the boldness of the
defamer and the false witness be encouraged. The diligence of
the prelate in correcting the excesses of his subjects ought to
be in proportion to the blameworthiness of allowing the offense
to go unpunished. Against such offenders, to say nothing of those
who are guilty of notorious crimes, there can be a threefold course
of procedure, namely, by accusation, by denunciation, and by inquiry,
in all of which, however, proper precaution must be exercised
lest perchance by undue haste grave detriment should result. The
accusation must be preceded by the legitima inscriptio, denunciation by the caritativa admonitio, and the inquiry
by the clamosa insinuatio (diffamatio); such moderation
to be always used that the forma sententiae be governed
by the forma judicii. The foregoing, however, does not
apply to regular clerics, who, when a reason exists, can be removed
from their charges more easily and expeditiously.
CANON 9
SUMMARY: In cities and dioceses where there are people of different
languages, the bishop must provide suitable priests to minister
to them. If necessity requires, let him appoint a vicar who shall
be responsible to him. There may not, however, be two bishops
in -the same diocese.
Text: Since in many places within the same city and diocese
there are people of different languages having one faith but various
rites and customs, we strictly command that the bishops of these
cities and dioceses provide suitable men who will, according to
the different rites and languages, celebrate the divine offices
for them, administer the sacraments of the Church and instruct
them by word and example. But we absolutely forbid that one and
the same city or diocese have more than one bishop, one body,
as it were, with several heads, which is a monstrosity. But if
by reason of the aforesaid conditions an urgent necessity should
arise, let the bishop of the locality after due deliberation appoint
a prelate acceptable to those races, who shall act as vicar in
the aforesaid matters and be subject to him all things. If anyone
shall act otherwise, let him consider himself excommunicated;
and if even then he will not amend, let him be deposed from every
ecclesiastical ministry, and if need be, let the secular arm be
employed, that such insolence may be curbed.
CANON 10
SUMMARY: Bishops who are unable to preach the word of God to
the people are to provide suitable men to do it for them. They
must see to it that the needs of the clergy so appointed are supplied,
otherwise their work will prove a failure.
Text: Among other things that pertain to the salvation
of the Christian people, the food of the word of God is above
all necessary, because as the body is nourished by material food,
so is the soul nourished by spiritual food, since "not in
bread alone doth man live but in every word that proceedeth from
the mouth of God" (Matt. 4: 4). It often happens that bishops,
on account of their manifold duties or bodily infirmities, or
because of hostile invasions or other reasons, to say nothing
of lack of learning, which must be absolutely condemned in them
and is not to be tolerated in the future, are themselves unable
to minister the word of God to the people, especially in large
and widespread dioceses. Wherefore we decree that bishops provide
suitable men, powerful in work and word, to exercise with fruitful
result the office of preaching; who in place of the bishops, since
these cannot do it, diligently visiting the people committed to
them, may instruct them by word and example. And when they are
in need, let them be supplied with the necessities, lest for want
of these they may be compelled to abandon their work at the very
beginning. Wherefore we command that in cathedral churches as
well as in conventual churches suitable men be appointed whom
the bishops may use as coadjutors and assistants, not only in
the office of preaching but also in hearing confessions, imposing
penances, and in other matters that pertain to the salvation of
souls. If anyone neglect to comply with this, he shall be subject
to severe punishment.
CANON 11
SUMMARY In every cathedral church and other churches also that
have sufficient means, a master is to be appointed to instruct gratis the clerics and poor students. The metropolitan
church ought to have a theologian who shall teach the clergy whatever
pertains to the cura animarum (i.e. care of souls).
Text. Since there are some who, on account of the lack
of necessary means, are unable to acquire an education or to meet
opportunities for perfecting themselves, the Third Lateran Council
in a salutary decree provided that in every cathedral church a
suitable benefice be assigned to a master who shall instruct gratis the clerics of that church and other poor students, by means
of which benefice the material needs of the master might be relieved
and to the students a way opened to knowledge. But, since in many
churches this is not observed, we, confirming the aforesaid decree,
add that, not only in every cathedral church but also in other
churches where means are sufficient, a competent master be appointed
by the prelate with his chapter, or elected by the greater and
more discerning part of the chapter, who shall instruct gratis and to the best of his ability the clerics of those and other
churches in the art of grammar and in other branches of knowledge.
In addition to a master, let the metropolitan church have also
a theologian, who shall instruct the priests and others in the
Sacred Scriptures and in those things especially that pertain
to the cura animarum. To each master let there be assigned by
the chapter the revenue of one benefice, and to the theologian
let as much be given by the metropolitan; not that they thereby
become canons, but they shall enjoy the revenue only so long as
they hold the office of instructor. If the metropolitan church
cannot support two masters, then it shall provide for the theologian
in the aforesaid manner, but for the one teaching grammar, let
it see to it that a sufficiency is provided by another church
of its city or diocese.
CANON 12
SUMMARY: Provincial chapters of regulars are to be held every
three years. All not canonically impeded must-attend. The chapters
to be under the guidance of two Cistercians, and careful attention
is to be given to the reform of the order and to regular observance.
Visitation of monasteries and nunneries. Ordinaries must strive
to ref'orm monasteries and ward off molestation of them by lay
officials.
Text: In every ecclesiastical province there shall be held
every three years, saving the right of the diocesan ordinaries,
a general chapter of abbots and of priors having no abbots, who
have not been accustomed to celebrate such chapters. This shall
be held in a monastery best adapted to this purpose and shall
be attended by all who are not canonically impeded, with this
restriction, however, that no one bring with him more than six
horses and eight persons. In inaugurating this new arrangement,
let two neighboring abbots of the Cistercian order be invited
to give them counsel and opportune assistance, since among them
the celebration of such chapters is of long standing. These two
Cistercians shall without hindrance choose from those present
two whom they consider the most competent, and these four shall
preside over the entire chapter, so that no one of these four
may assume the authority of leadership; should it become expedient,
they may be changed by prudent deliberation. Such a chapter shall
be celebrated for several consecutive days according the custom
of the Cistercian order. During its deliberations careful attention
is to be given to the reform of the order and to regular observance,
and what has been enacted with the approval of the four shall
be observed inviolably by all, excuses, contradictions, and appeals
to the contrary notwithstanding. In each of these chapters the
place for the holding of the following one is to be determined.
All those in attendance, even if f or want of room many must occupy
other houses, must live the vita communis and bear proportionately
all common expenses. In the same chapter religious and prudent
persons should be appointed who, in our name, shall visit every
abbey in the province, not only of monks but also of nuns, according
to a form prescribed for them, correcting and reforming those
things that need correction and reform; so that, if they should
know that the rector of a locality ought to be removed from office,
let them make it known to his bishop, that he may procure his
removal; but if he should neglect to do it, then the appointed
visitors shall refer the matter to the attention of the Apostolic
See. We wish and command that canons regular observe this according
to their order. But if in this new arrangement a difficulty should
arise which cannot be disposed of by the aforesaid persons, let
it be referred without scandal to the judgment of the Apostolic
See; in the meantime let the other things that have been accomplished
by amicable deliberation be in. violably observed. Moreover, the
diocesan ordinaries must strive so to reform the monasteries subject
to them, that when the aforesaid visitors come to them they will
find in them more that is worthy of commendation than of correction,
taking special care lest the monasteries be oppressed by them
with undue burdens. For, while we wish that the rights of the
superiors be respected, we do not on that account wish that injury
be sustained by inferiors. We strictly command diocesan bishops
and persons attending the chapters, that with ecclesiastical censure-every
appeal being denied-they restrain advocates, patrons, vicegerents,
rulers, consuls, nobles, and soldiers, and all others, from molesting
the monasteries either in persons or properties and if perchance
these persons should so molest, let the aforesaid bishops and
chapter members not neglect to compel these latter to make satisfaction,
that the monasteries may serve Almighty
God more freely and peacefully.
CANON 13
SUMMARY: The founding of new religious orders is forbidden.
New monasteries must accept a rule already approved. A monk may
not reside in different monasteries nor may one abbot preside
over several monasteries.
Text. Lest too great a diversity of religious orders lead
to grave confusion in the Church of God, we strictly forbid anyone
in the future to found a new order, but whoever should wish to
enter an order, let him choose one already approved. Similarly,
he who would wish to found a new monastery, must accept a rule
already proved. We forbid also anyone to presume to be a monk
in different monasteries (that is, belong to different monasteries),
or that one abbot preside over several monasteries.
CANON 14
Summary: Clerics, especially those in sacred orders, shall
live chastely and virtuously. Anyone suspended for incontinency
who presumes to celebrate the divine mysteries shall be forever
deposed.
Text: That the morals and general conduct of clerics may
be better let all strive to live chastely and virtuously, particularly
those in sacred orders, guarding against every vice of desire,
especially that on account of which the anger of God came from
heaven upon the children of unbelief, so that in the sight of
Almighty God they may perform their duties with a pure heart and
chaste body. But lest the facility to obtain pardon be an incentive
to do wrong, we decree that whoever shall be found to indulge
in the vice of incontinence, shall, in proportion to the gravity
of his sin, be punished in accordance with the canonical statutes,
which we command to be strictly and rigorously observed, so that
he whom divine fear does not restrain from evil, may at least
be withheld from sin by a temporal penalty. If therefore anyone
suspended for this reason shall presume to celebrate the divine
mysteries, let him not only be deprived of his ecclesiastical
benefices but for this twofold offense let him be forever deposed.
Prelates who dare support such in their iniquities, especially
in view of money or other temporal advantages, shall be subject
to a like punishment. But if those. who according to the practice
of their country have not renounced the conjugal bond, fall by
the vice of impurity, they are to be punished more severely, since
they can use matrimony lawfully.
CANON 15
SUMMARY Clerics, who after being warned do not abstain from
drunkenness, shall be suspended from their office and benefice.
Text. All clerics shall carefully abstain from drunkenness.
Wherefore, let them accommodate the wine to themselves, and themselves
to the wine. Nor shall anyone be encouraged to drink, for drunkenness
banishes reason and incites to lust. We decree, therefore, that
that abuse be absolutely abolished by which in some localities
the drinkers bind themselves suo modo to an equal portion
of drink and he in their judgment is the hero of the day who out
drinks the others. Should anyone be culpable in this matter, unless
he heeds the warning of the superior and makes suitable satisfaction,
let him be suspended from his benefice or office.
We forbid hunting and fowling to all clerics; wherefore, let them
not presume to keep dogs and birds for these purposes.
CANON 16
SUMMARY Clerics are not to engage in secular pursuits, attend
unbecoming exhibitions, visit taverns, or play games of chance.
Their clothing must be in keeping with their dignity.
Text. Clerics shall not hold secular offices or engage
in secular and, above all, dishonest pursuits. They shall not
attend the performances of mimics and buffoons, or theatrical
representations. They shall not visit taverns except in case of
necessity, namely, when on a journey. They are forbidden to play
games of chance or be present at them. They must have a becoming
crown and tonsure and apply themselves diligently to the study
of the divine offices and other useful subjects. Their garments
must be worn clasped at the top and neither too short nor too
long. They are not to use red or green garments or curiously sewed
together gloves, or beak-shaped shoes or gilded bridles, saddles,
pectoral ornaments (for horses), spurs, or anything else indicative
of superfluity. At the divine office in the church they are not
to wear cappas with long sleeves, and priests and dignitaries
may not wear them elsewhere except in case of danger when circumstances
should require a change of outer garments. Buckles may under no
condition be worn, nor sashes having ornaments of gold or silver,
nor rings, unless it be in keeping with the dignity of their office.
All bishops must use in public and in the church outer garments
made of linen, except those who are monks, in which case they
must wear the habit of their order; in public they must not appear
with open mantles, but these must be clasped either on the back
of the neck or on the bosom.
CANON 17
SUMMARY. Prelates and clerics are commanded in virtue of obedience
to celebrate diligently and devoutly the diurnal and nocturnal
offices.
Text: It is a matter for regret that there are some minor
clerics and even prelates who spend half of the night in banqueting
and in unlawful gossip, not to mention other abuses, and in giving
the remainder to sleep. They are scarcely awakened by the diurnal
concerts of the birds. Then they hasten through matins in a hurried
and careless manner. There are others who say mass scarcely four
times a year and, what is worse, do not even attend mass, and
when they are present they are engaged outside in conversation
with lay people to escape the silence of the choir; so that, while
they readily lend their ears to unbecoming talk, they regard with
utter indifference things that are divine. These and all similar
things, therefore, ,we absolutely forbid under penalty of suspension,
and strictly command in virtue of obedience that they celebrate
diligently and devoutly the diurnal and nocturnal offices so far
as God gives them strength.
CANON 18
SUMMARY Clerics may neither pronounce nor execute a sentence
of death. Nor may they act as judges in extreme criminal cases,
or take pa in matters connected with judicial tests and ordeals.
Text. No cleric may pronounce a sentence of death, or execute
such a sentence, or be present at its execution. If anyone in
consequence of this prohibition (hujusmodi occasions statuti) should presume to inflict damage on churches or injury on
ecclesiastical persons, let him be restrained by ecclesiastical
censure. Nor may any cleric write or dictate letters destined
for the execution of such a sentence. Wherefore, in the chanceries
of the princes let this matter be committed to laymen and not
to clerics. Neither may a cleric act as judge in the case of the
Rotarrii, archers, or other men of this kind devoted to the shedding
of blood. No subdeacon, deacon, or priest shall practice that
part of surgery involving burning and cutting. Neither shall anyone
in judicial tests or ordeals by hot or cold water or hot iron
bestow any blessing; the earlier prohibitions in regard to dueling
remain in force.
CANON 19
SUMMARY: Household goods must not be stored in churches unless
there be an urgent necessity. Churches, church vessels, and the
like must be kept clean.
Text: We do not wish to leave uncorrected the practice
of certain clerics who convert the churches into storehouses for
their own household goods and also for those of others,"'
so that the churches have the appearance of the houses of lay
people rather than of the house of God, not considering that the
Lord does not permit the carrying of a vessel through the temple.
There are also others who not only neglect to keep the churches
clean but also leave the vessels, vestments, palls, and corporals
so unclean that sometimes they are a source of aversion. Wherefore,
since the zeal of the house of God hath eaten us up (John 2: I
7), we strictly forbid that household goods be placed in the churches,
unless by reason of hostile invasion, sudden fire, or other urgent
reasons it should become necessary to store them there. When,
however, the necessity no longer exists, let them be returned
to their proper place. We command also that the aforesaid churches,
vessels, corporals, and vestments be kept clean and bright. For
it is absurd to tolerate in sacred things a filthiness that is
unbecoming even in profane things.
CANON 20
SUMMARY: In all churches the Eucharist and the chrism must
be kept under lock and .key. Those who neglect to do this, are
to be suspended.
Text: We decree that in all churches the chrism and the
Eucharist be kept in properly protected places provided with locks
and keys, that they may not be reached by rash and indiscreet
persons and used for impious and blasphemous purposes. But if
he to whom such guardianship pertains should leave them unprotected,
let him be suspended from office for a period of three months.
And if through his negligence an execrable deed should result,
let him be punished more severely.
CANON 21
SUMMARY Everyone who has attained the age of reason is bound
to confess his sins at least once a year to his own parish pastor
with his permission to another, and to receive the Eucharist at
least at Easter. A priest who reveals a sin confided to him in
confession is to be deposed and relegated to a monastery for the
remainder of his life.
Text. All the faithful of both sexes shall after they have
reached the age of discretion faithfully confess all their sins
at least once a year to their own (parish) priest and perform
to the best of their ability the penance imposed, receiving reverently
at least at Easter the sacrament of the Eucharist, unless perchance
at the advice of their own priest they may for a good reason abstain
for a time from its reception; otherwise they shall be cut off
from the Church (excommunicated) during life and deprived of Christian
burial in death. Wherefore, let this salutary decree be published
frequently in the churches, that no one may find in the plea of
ignorance a shadow of excuse. But if anyone for a good reason
should wish to confess his sins to another priest, let him first
seek and obtain permission from his own (parish) priest, since
otherwise he (the other priest) cannot loose or bind him.
Let the priest be discreet and cautious that he may pour wine
and oil into the wounds of the one injured after the manner of
a skilful physician, carefully inquiring into the circumstances
of the sinner and the sin, from the nature of which he may understand
what kind of advice to give and what remedy to apply, making use
of different experiments to heal the sick one. But let him exercise
the greatest precaution that he does not in any degree by word,
sign, or any other manner make known the sinner, but should he
need more prudent counsel, let him seek it cautiously without
any mention of the person. He who dares to reveal a sin confided
to him in the tribunal of penance, we decree that he be not only
deposed from the sacerdotal office but also relegated to a monastery
of strict observance to do penance for the remainder of his life.
CANON 22
SUMMARY. Physicians of the body called to the bedside of the
sick shall before all advise them to call for the physician of
souls, so that, spiritual health being restored, bodily health
will follow.
Text: Since bodily infirmity is sometimes caused by sin,
the Lord saying to the sick man whom he had healed: "Go and
sin no more, lest some worse thing happen to thee" (John
5: I4), we declare in the present decree and strictly command
that when physicians of the body are called to the bedside of
the sick, before all else they admonish them to call for the physician
of souls, so that after spiritual health has been restored to
them, the application of bodily medicine may be of greater benefit,
for the cause being removed the effect will pass away. We publish
this decree for the reason that some, when they are sick and are
advised by the physician in the course of the sickness to attend
to the salvation of their soul, give up all hope and yield more
easily to the danger of death. If any .physician shall transgress
this decree after it has been published by bishops, let him be
cut off (arceatur) from the Church till he has made suitable
satisfaction for his transgression. And since the soul id far
more precious than the body, we forbid under penalty of anathema
that a physician advise a patient to have recourse to sinful means
for the recovery of bodily health.
CANON 23
SUMMARY If those to whom it Pertains neglect to elect a bishop
for a cathedral within three months, then this duty devolves upon
the next immediate superior. If he neglects to do so within three
months, he shall be punished.
Text. That the ravenous wolf may not invade the Lord's
flock that is without a pastor, that a widowed church may not
suffer grave loss in its properties, that danger to soul may be
averted, and that provision may be made for the security of the
churches, we decree that a cathedral or regular church must not
be without a bishop for more than three months. If within this
time an election has not been held by those to whom it pertains,
though there was no impediment, the electors lose their right
of voting, and the right to appoint devolves upon the next immediate
superior. Let the one upon whom this right to appoint devolves,
having God before his eyes, not delay more than three months to
provide canonically and with the advice of the chapter and other
prudent men the widowed church with a suitable pastor, if he wishes
to escape canonical punishment. This pastor is to be chosen from
the widowed church itself, or from another in case a suitable
one is not found therein.
CANON 24
SUMMARY. Three forms or methods of election are recognized:
the normal one by ballot, by compromise, and by quasi-inspiration.
No one may vote by proxy.
Text. Since, on account of the different forms of elections
which some endeavor to employ, many impediments arise and great
danger threatens the widowed churches, we decree that when an
election is to take place and all are present who ought, wish,
and are able tobe present, let three trustworthy members of the
assembly be chosen who shall with care collect secretly and one
by one the votes of all; and when these have been written down,
he is to be considered elected who has obtained all or the majority
of the votes of the chapter, absolutely no appeal being allowed.
Or the authority of making the choice may be entrusted to some
confidential persons, who in the place of all may provide a pastor
for the widowed church. An election in any other form is not valid,
unless perchance there is absolute unanimity among the electors,
as if by divine inspiration. Whoever shall attempt to hold an
election contrary to the aforesaid forms, shall for this time
be deprived of his vote. We absolutely forbid that anyone appoint
a representative in the matter of an election (that is, vote by
proxy), unless he be canonically impeded and cannot come, in which
case, if need be, let him declare himself to that effect on oath,
and then he may choose one of his colleagues at the assembly to
represent him. We also disapprove of clandestine elections, and
decree that as soon as an election has it must be solemnly made
public.
CANON 25
Summary. He who consents to the election of himself with the
aid of the secular power becomes thereby ineligible, and the election
is null.
Text. Whoever shall presume to consent to the election
of himself through the abusive intervention of the secular authorities
contrary to canonical liberty, shall lose the advantage he has
gained therefrom and shall be ineligible in the future, nor may
he be chose,, or raised to any other dignity without a dispensation.
Those who presume to hold an election of this kind (that is, those
who allow themselves to be influenced by secular authorities),
we declare to be ipso jure invalid, let them be absolutely
suspended from offices and benefices for a period of three years,
and during this time let them be deprived of the right of voting.
CANON 26
Summary. If a prelate through negligence has confirmed the
election of an unworthy candidate for the guidance of souls, he
is to lose the right of confirming the first successor of such
a one and is also to be deprived of the revenue of his benefice,
and the the one unworthily promoted is to be removed. If his action
was prompted by malice, a severer penalty is to be imposed on
him.
Text. Nothing is more injurious to the Church of God than
the selection of unworthy prelates for the direction of souls.
Wishing, therefore, to apply the necessary remedy to this evil,
we decree by an irrefragable ordinance that when anyone has been
elected for the guidance of souls, he to whom the confirmation
of the election belongs shall carefully investigate the process
and circumstances of the election as well as the person of the
one elected, and only when everything proves to be satisfactory
may he confirm. If through carelessness the contrary should take
place, then not only the one unworthily promoted is to be removed,
but the one also who furthered such promotion (by confirmation)
is to be punished. The latter's punishment, we decree, shall consist
in this, that when it is agreed that through negligence he confirmed
a person who lacks sufficient knowledge or is wanting in integrity
of morals or is not of legitimate age, not only is he to lose
the right of confirming the first successor of such a person,
but, that he may not in some case escape punishment, he is also
to be deprived of the revenues of his benefice till he be deemed
worthy of pardon. If, however, the evidence shows that his action
was inspired by malice, a severer punishment is to be imposed
on him. Bishops also, if they wish to escape canonical punishment,
shall take the necessary precaution to promote to sacred orders
and ecclesiastical dignities only such as are qualified to discharge
worthily the duties of the office committed to them. Those who
are immediately subject to the Roman pontiff, must appear personally
before him for confirmation if this can be done conveniently,
otherwise they may send suitable persons from whom may be ascertained
the necessary information regarding the process of the election
and the person of the one elected; so that only after a thorough
investigation by the pope will those elected obtain the plenitude
of their office, provided, of course, there be no canonical obstruction.
Those who live at a great distance, that is outside of Italy,
if they have been elected unanimously, may in the meantime and
by way of exception (dispensative), on account of the needs
of the churches, administer the respective offices in matters
spiritual and temporal, so, however that they alienate absolutely
nothing belonging to the churches. The consecration or benediction
let them receive as has so far been the custom."
CANON 27
SUMMARY Incompetent persons must not be promoted to the priesthood
or given the direction of souls.
Text. Since the direction of souls is the art of arts,
we strictly command that bishops, either themselves or through
other qualified men, diligently prepare and instruct those to
be elevated to the priesthood in the divine offices and in the
proper administration of the sacraments of the Church. If in the
future they presume to ordain ignorant and unformed men (a defect
that can easily be discovered), we decree that both those ordaining
and those ordained be subject to severe punishment. In the ordination
of priests especially, it is better to have a few good ministers
than many who are no good, for if the blind lead the blind both
will fall into the pit (Matt. 15:14).
CANON 28
SUMMARY: He who seeks and obtains permission to resign must
do so.
Text: There are some who urgently seek permission to resign
and after obtaining such permission neglect to do so. But since
in requesting a resignation they seemed to have in view the needs
of the churches over which they preside or their own salvation,
neither of which we wish to be impeded, whether by the sophistication
of self-seeking or by mere instability, we decree that they be
compelled to resign.
CANON 29
SUMMARY Anyone having a benefice with the cura animarum annexed,
if he accepts another, shall lose the first; and if he attempts
to retain it, he shall lose the other also. After the reception
of the second benefice, the first may be freely conferred on another.
If he to whom that collation belongs should delay beyond six months,
then it shall devolve on another and the form shall indemnify
the church for the losses incurred during the vacancy
Text. With much foresight it was prohibited in the Lateran
Council that no one should, contrary to the sacred canons, accept
several ecclesiastical dignities or several parochial churches;
otherwise the one receiving should lose what he received, and
the one who bestowed be deprived of the right of collation. But
since, on account of the boldness and avarice of some, the aforesaid
statute has thus far produced little or no fruit, we, wishing
to meet the situation more clearly and emphatically, declare in
the present decree that whoever shall accept a benefice to which
is annexed the cura animamm after having previously obtained
such a benefice, shall ipso jure be deprived of this (the
first one); and if perchance he should attempt to retain it, let
him be deprived of the other one also. He to whom the collation
of the first benefice belongs may freely confer it, after the
incumbent has accepted a second, on anyone whom he may deem worthy;
should he delay to do so beyond a period of six months, then in
accordance with the decree of the Lateran Council, let not only
its collation devolve on another, but also let him be compelled
to indemnify the church in question from his own resources equal
to the amount of the revenues drawn from it during its vacancy.
The same we decree is to be observed in regard to dignities (personatus),
adding, that no one may presume to have several dignities in the
same church, even though they have not the cura animarum annexed.
Only in the case of eminent and learned persons who are to be
honored with major benefices, can the Apostolic See, if need be,
grant a dispensation.
CANON 30
Summary. The provincial synod is to suspend from the collation
of benefices those who after two admonitions confer benefices
on unworthy persons. The removal of this suspension the pope reserves
to himself or to the patriarch of the one suspended.
Text. It is a very inconsistent and grave matter that some
bishops, when they can promote suitable men to ecclesiastical
benefices, do not fear to choose unworthy ones, who lack integrity
of morals and sufficient knowledge, following the carnal and inordinate
affections for their kindred rather than the judgment of reason.
The great detriment that thus accrues to the churches no one of
sound mind is ignorant of. Wishing, therefore, to cure this disease,
we command that unworthy persons be rejected and suitable ones,
who will and can render to God and the churches an acceptable
service, be chosen; and let a careful investigation in regard
to this matter be made in the annual provincial synod. Anyone
who has been found culpable after the first and second admonition,
let him be suspended by the synod from conferring benefices, and
in the same synod let a prudent and upright person be appointed
who may take the place of the one suspended. The same is to be
observed in regard to the chapters that prove delinquent in this
matter. An offense of this kind on the part of a metropolitan
must be made known by the synod to a higher superior. That this
salutary provision may be more effectively observed, such a sentence
of suspension may by no means e removed except by the authority
of the Roman pontiff or by the patriarch of the one suspended,
that in this matter also the four patriarchal sees may be specially
honored.
CANON 31
Summary. Illegitimate sons of canons may not be appointed heir
fathers serve. Such appointments are invalid.
Text. To destroy that worst of corruptions that grown up
in many churches, we strictly forbid that the sons of canons,
especially the illegitimate ones be made canons in the same secular
churches in which their fathers have been appointed. Such appointments,
we decree are invalid; those who presume to make them, let them
be suspended from their benefices
****
CANON 32
Summary. The rector of a church, notwithstanding the custom
of bishops and patrons must have a sufficient portion of the
revenues of the church. He who has a parochial church must serve
it-himself. If another be annexed to it, a vicar must be the latter,
who shall enjoy a portio congruens of its revenues.
Text. In some localities a vice has grown up, namely, that
patrons of parochial churches and some other persons (including
bishops), arrogate to themselves the revenues of those churches,
leaving to the priests attached to them such a meager portion
as to deprive them of a decent subsistence. For we have learned
from a source, the authority of which is unquestionable that in
some places the parochial clergy receive for sustenance only a quarta quartae, that is one sixteenth of the tithes. Whence
it is that in these localities there seldom is found a parochial
priest who possesses more than a very limited knowledge of letters.
Since therefore the mouth of the ox that threshes should not be
muzzled, and he who serves the altar should live by the altar,
we decree that no custom on the part patron, or anybody else shall
stand in the way of priests receiving a portio sufficiens.
He who has a parochial church must serve it himself and not entrust
its administration to a vicar, unless perchance there be a parochial
church annexed to the prebend or dignity, in which case we grant
that he who has such a prebend or dignity, since it behooves him
to serve in the major church, may ask to have appointed for the
parochial church a suitable and irremovable vicar, who, as was
said before, shall enjoy a portio congruens of the revenues
of that church; otherwise by the authority of this decree let
him be deprived of it and let it be conferred on another who will
and can fulfil the aforesaid requirements. We also absolutely
forbid that anyone presume to confer fraudulently on another a
pension as a benefice from the revenues of a church that ought
to have its own priest (proprius saceraos).
CANON 33
Summary. Prelates may demand procurations only when they conduct
visitations and then they must observe the restrictions of the
Lateran Council. On their visitations they should devote themselves
to preaching and reform.
Text. The procurationes [the hospitality or procuration extended
to a bishop and his assistants in the course of his canonical
vistation] which by reason of visitation are due to bishops,
archdeacons, and others, also to legates and nuncios of the Apostolic
See, are, except in a case of manifest and urgent necessity, to
be demanded only when they personally conduct the visitation,
and then they must observe the restrictions made by the Lateran
Council [III Lat, canon 4] in regard to the number of horses and
persons accompanying them. This restriction being observed, should
the legates and nuncios of the Apostolic See find it necessary
to make a delay in any place, to avoid being too great a burden
on the place, let them receive moderate procurations from other
churches or persons who have not yet been burdened in the way
of supplying such sustenance; so that the number of procurations
may not exceed the number of days of the delay, and should some
procuration by itself not suffice, let two or more be united in
one. Moreover, those conducting the visitation shall not seek
their own interests, but those of Jesus Christ, devoting themselves
to preaching, exhortation, correction, and reform, that they may
bring back fruit that perishes not. Whoever shall presume to act
contrary to this decree, shall not only return what he received,
but to the church that he so op pressed he shall also make compensation
equivalent to his injustice.
CANON 34
Summary. Prelates are not to take from their subjects more
than is due to them. Those who act contrary to this must make
restitution and also give an equal amount to the poor.
9The hospitality or procuration extended to the bishop and his
assistants in the course of his canonical (fiocesan visitation.
Text. Since very many prelates, that they may provide papal
legates and others with procurations and the like, extort from
their subjects more than they hand over to them (to the legates),
and, chasing after gain to their own damnation, seek among their
subjects plunder rather than help, we forbid that this be done
in the future. If anyone perchance should presume to act contrary
to this decision, he shall not only restore what he has thus extorted,
but he shall also be compelled to give an equal amount to the
poor. If the superior with whom a complaint in regard to this
matter has been lodged, proves negligent in the execution of this
decree, let him be subject to canonical punishment.
CANON 35
Summary. An appellant, feeling that he has good grounds for
an appeal before sentence, must make those grounds known to the
judgc of the first instance. If sufficient, this is to be made
known to the superior judge; if insufficient, the latter must
return the appellant to the judge of the first instance.
Text. That proper respect may be shown the judges and that
the interests of the litigants in the matter of labor and expenses
may be duly considered, we decree that when anyone proceeds against
an adversary before a competent judge, he shall not without good
reason appeal to a higher judge before sentence is pronounced,
but shall continue his case before the same judge (that is, of
the first instance), even if he say that he has sent a message
to the superior judge or has received letters from the same, as
long as the letters have not been given to the delegated judge.
But if he thinks he has sufficient ground for an appeal, he must
make known this ground to the same judge, and, if it be found
legal, let it be made known to the superior judge; if the superior
judge finds the ground for an appeal insufficient, he must return
the appellant to the judge of the first instance, who shall condemn
him to pay the expenses also of the other party. Otherwise let
him proceed, saving, of course, the ordinances governing the causae
majores, which must be referred to the Apostolic See.
CANON 36
Summary. If a judge from whose interlocutory sentence an appeal
has been taken does not execute it, he can proceed with the principal
cause.
Text. When an ordinary or delegated judge has pronounced
a interlocutory sentence, the execution of which would be oppressive
to to one of the litigants, but following prudent counsel from
carrying into effect this threat or interlocutory sentence. He
can proceed with the principal cause, even if an appeal been taken
from such a threat or interlocutory sentence (provided he be not
suspected from another legitimate source), so that the progress
of the case may not be delayed by trifling circumstances.
CANON 37
Summary. No one may by means of Apostolic letters be summoned
before a judge who is distant more than two days from his diocese,
except with the consent of both parties or express mention is
made of this decree. Without an order from the other party, such
letters are invalid.
Text. Some, abusing the good will of the Apostolic See,
attempt to obtain from it letters whereby their disputes may be
referred to judges residing at a remote distance. This they do
to fatigue the accused with labor and expenses, that thus he may
be compelled to yield in the matter under dispute or by payment
free himself from the vexations of the plaintiff. Since however
a legal trial ought not to open the door to injustice, as is forbidden
by the law, we decree that no one may by means of Apostolic letters
be summoned before a judge who is distant more than two days from
his diocese, except with the consent of both parties or express
mention is made of this decree.
There are also others who, turning themselves to a new kind of
commercialism, that they may revive old complaints or introduce
new questions, fabricate causes, on the strength of which they
seek letters from the Apostolic See without a mandate from the
person for whom they act, which letters they offer for sale either
to the accused party that with their aid he may not be exposed
to the loss of labor and expenses, or to the plaintiff that with
these he may fatigue his opponent by undue vexations. Since, however,
disputes are to be restricted in number rather than multiplied,
we decree that if anyone shall in the future presume to seek Apostolic
letters upon any question without a special mandate from the person
for whom he is acting, such letters shall be regarded as invalid,
and he shall be punished as a falsifier, unless perchance it be
a question of persons from whom a mandate ought not be legally
required.
CANON 38
Summary. A judge must employ a notary or two competent men
to put in writing the acts of the judicial process, so that if
a dispute arise regarding any action of the judge, the truth can
be established by referring to these documents. If any difficulty
should arise because of a neglect of this, let the judge be punished.
Text. Since against the false assertion of an unjust judge
the innocent party sometimes cannot prove the truth of a denial,
because by the very nature of things there is no direct proof
of one denying a fact, that falsity may not prejudice the truth,
and injustice may not prevail over justice, we decree that in
an ordinary as well as extraordinary inquiry (judicium) let
the judge always employ either a public person (if he can be had)
or two competent men who shall faithfully take down in writing
all the acts of the inquiry, namely, citations and delays, refusals
and exceptions, petitions and replies, interrogations and confessions,
the depositions of witnesses and preesentation of documents, interlocutions,
appeals, renunciations, decisions, and other acts which take place
must be written down in convenient order, the time, places, and
persons to be designated. A copy of everything thus written is
to be handed to each of the parties, the originals are to remain
in possession of the writers; so at if a dispute should arise
in regard to any action of the judge, the truth can be established
by a reference to these documents. This provision is made to protect
the innocent party against judges who areimprudent and dishonest.
A judge who neglects to observe this decree, if on account of
this neglect some difficulty should arise, let him be duly punished
by a superior judge; nor is there any presumption in favor of
doing things his way unless it be evident from legitimate documents
in the case.
CANON 39
Summary. Anyone who knowingly accepts a stolen article must
restore it to the one from whom it was taken.
Text. It often happens that a thief transfers to another
what he has unjustly taken, and the one robbed is rendered helpless
in any process against the possessor to obtain restitution, because
the claim of possession having vanished on account of the difficulty
or lack of proof, the right of ownership ceases. Wherefore,
notwithstanding the rigor of the civil law, we decree that if
anyone in the future shall knowingly accept such an article, thus
becoming a participant in the theft-for after all there is little
difference, especially when it is a question of danger to the
soul, whether one holds unjustly or takes what belongs to another-the
one robbed is to be assisted to obtain restitution from such a
possessor.
CANON 40
Summary. The plaintiff is still the owner of the article that
has for one year by violence or deceit been withheld from him.
Text. It sometimes happens that the plaintiff to whom,
in consequence of the non-appearance (contumacia, that
is, disobedience) of the opposing party, the possession of the
object in dispute is judicially awarded, cannot on account of
the violence or deceit of the accused obtain actual possession
for a whole year, and thus, since in the opinion of many he is
not after the lapse of a year to be regarded as the owner, the
malice of the accused gains the advantage. Therefore, that the
condition of the disobedient may not be better than that of the
obedient, we decree that in the aforesaid case even after the
lapse of a year the plaintiff is the true owner.
In general we forbid that decisions in ecclesiastical matters
be referred to a layman, because it is not becoming that a layman
should arbitrate in much matters.
CANON 41
Summary. No prescription is valid unless it rests on good faith.
Text. Since all that is not of faith is sin (Rom. 14: 23),
we decree that no prescription, whether canonical or civil, is
valid unless it rests on good faith; because in a general way
a prescription that cannot be maintained without mortal sin is
in conflict with all law and custom. Wherefore it is essential
that he who holds a prescription should at no time be aware of
the fact that the object belongs to another.
CANON 42
SUMMARY No cleric may so extend his jurisdiction as to become
detrimental to secular justice.
Text. As desirous as we are that laymen do not usurp the
rights of clerics, we are no less desirous that clerics abstain
from arrogating to themselves the rights of laymen. Wherefore
we forbid all clerics so to extend in the future their jurisdiction
under the pretext of ecclesiastical liberty as to prove detrimental
to secular justice; but let them be content with the laws and
customs thus far approved, that the things that are Caesar's may
be rendered to Caesar, and those that are God's may by a just
division be rendered to God.
CANON 43
Summary. Clerics under no obligation to laymen in matters temporal
are not bound to take an oath of fidelity to them.
Text. Some laymen (that is, princes) attempt to usurp too
much of the divine right when they compel ecclesiastical persons
who are under no obligation to them in matters temporal, to take
an oath of fidelity to them. Wherefore, since according to the
Apostle, "To the Lord the servant standeth or falleth"
(Rom. 14: 4), we forbid by the authority of the sacred council
that such clerics be forced by secular persons to take an oath
of this kind.
CANON 44
Summary. Alienation of ecclesiastical properties by laymen
without the legitimate 3sent of ecclesiastical authority is forbidden.
Text. Since no power to dispose of ecclesiastical properties
has been given to laymen, even though they be pious, their duty
being to obey, not to command, we regret that in some of them
charity has grown so cold that they do not fear in their laws
or rather monstrosities (confictionibus) to attack the
immunity of ecclesiastical property, which not only the holy fathers
but also the secular princes have fortified with many privileges;
presuming illicitly that power not only in the matter of the alienation
of fiefs and other ecclesiastical possessions and of the usurpation
of jurisdictions, but also in the matter of mortuaries and other
things that seem annexed to the spiritual right. Wishing, therefore,
in this matter to secure the churches against loss and to provide
against such injustice, we decree with the approval of the sacred
council that laws of this kind and appropriations of fiefs and
other ecclesiastical properties made without the legitimate consent
of ecclesiastical persons under pretext of lay power, do not hold,
since they cannot be called laws but rather want of law or destruction
and usurpation of jurisdiction, and those having recourse to such
presumptions are to be checked ecclesiastical censure.
CANON 45
Summary. Patrons and others who exceed their rights in the
matter of church government are to be restrained by censures.
If they kill or mutilate a cleric, they shall lose their rights
and to the fourth generation their posterity shall be excluded
from clerical state.
Text. In some provinces patrons, vicegerents, and advocates
of churches have so far advanced in insolence that not only do
they create difficulties and mischief when vacant churches are
to be provided with competent pastors, but they also presume to
administer the possessions and other ecclesiastical goods at
their own will; and what is worse, they do not fear to put the
prelates to death. Since, therefore, what has been ordained as
a means of defense must not br perverted into an instrument of
destruction, we expressly forbid patrons, advocates, and vicegerents
in the future to extend their jurisdiction in the aforesaid matter
beyond what is permitted them by law. and should they act contrary
to this, let them be restrained by canonical penalties. With the
approval of the holy council we decree that if patrons, advocates,
feudal tenants, vicegerents, or other beneficiaries should presume
either per se or per alios to kill or mutilate the rector
of some church or another cleric of that church, the patrons shall
lose absolutely their right of patronage, the advocates their
office of counselor, the feudal tenants their fief, the vicegerents
their vicegerency, and beneficiaries their benefice. That the
punishments may not be impressed upon the memory less deeply than
the excesses, not only shall their heirs be deprived of all favors
accruing to them from the aforesaid offices, but to the fourth
generation the posterity of such shall be absolutely excluded
from the clerical state, nor may they hold the office of prelate
it, religious houses, unless by an act of mercy they have received
a dispensation.
CANON 46
Summary. Clerics should not contribute to the needs of cities
and other localities, even where the resources of the lay people
do not suffice, without first consulting the Roman pontiff. Laws
by those excommunicated are null. Rulers remain excommunicated
after the expiration of their term of office till they have made
satisfaction.
Text. Against magistrates and rulers of cities and others who
strive to oppress churches and ecclesiastical persons with taxes
and other exactions, the Lateran Council, [III Lat, canon 9] desiring
to protect ecclesiastical immunity, prohibited actions of this
kind under penalty of anathema, commanding that transgressors
and their abetters punished with excommunication until they make
suitable satisfaction. But, if the bishop with his clergy should
perceive such necessity or utility and without compulsion decide
that the aid of the churches ought to be enlisted to meet the
needs where the resources of the lay people do not suffice, let
the aforesaid lay people accept such assistance humbly, devoutly,
and with gratitude. However, on account of the boldness of some,
let them first consult the Roman pontiff, to whom it belongs to
attend to common needs. But, if even this does not allay the malice
of some toward the Church of God, we add that the laws and enactments
which have been promulgated by excommunicated persons in this
matter or by their orders, be considered null and void and at
no time whatever
be regarded as valid. But, since fraud and deception ought not
to protect anyone, let no one be deceived by the illusion that,
although a ruler may incur anathema during the period of his incumbency,
yet on the expiration of his term of office there will be no compulsion
to make due satisfaction. For both he who refuses to make satisfaction
and his successor, if they do not make satisfaction within a month,
we decree that they remain bound by ecclesiastical censure until
they have made suitable satisfaction, since he assumes the burden
who is successor in the honor.
CANON 47
Summary. Prelates are not to excommunicate subjects without
a previous warning and without a reasonable cause; those guilty
of this shall be punished. A subject also shall be punished who
falsely protests that he has been unjustly excommunicated.
Text. With the approval of the holy council we prohibit
the promulgation of the sentence of excommunication against anyone
without a previous warning and in the presence of suitable persons
by whom, if need be, such admonition can be proved. Should anyone
act contrariwise, even if the sentence of excommunication is a
just one, let him know that he is forbidden entrance to the church
for a period of one month, which punishment, however, is to be
altered should it be deemed advisable. Let also proper precaution
be taken against excommunicating anyone without a just and reasonable
cause; should this perchance have happened and he who imposed
the sentence does not care to withdraw it without complaint, then
the one injured may take his complaint of unjust excommunication
to a superior, who, if there be no danger in delay, shall send
him back to the excommunicator with the command that he absolve
him within a specified time; otherwise he himself, should it seem
fit, after the presentation of a sufficient reason, will grant
him the required absolution either per se or per alium. When
it is an evident case against the excommunicator of unjust excommunication,
let him again be condemned to pay all the expenses and to repair
all the damages incurred by the one unjustly excommunicated;
if, however, the gravity of his fault demands it, let him be punished
in accordance with the judgment of the superior, since it is not
a trivial fault 'to impose such a punishment on an innocent person,
unless per chance he erred from a probable cause, especially if
there was apparently good ground for his action. But if against
the sentence of excommunication no reasonable proof was offered
by the complainant, then for the unjust annoyance of his complaint
let him condemned to pay the expenses and repair the damages,
or else, let him be punished in accordance with the decision of
the superior, unless perchance probable error likewise excuses
him; and in regard to the matter for which he was excommunicated,
through an adequate pledge let him be compelled to make satisfaction,
or let the original sentence be reimposed even for the purpose
of forcing him to make condign satisfaction. But if the judge,
recognizing his error, is prepared to revoke such a sentence,
and he on whom it was imposed appeals against such a revocation
unless satisfaction is made, let him not heed the appeal unless
it be an error about which there can be a just doubt, and then
on the receipt of a satisfactory pledge that he will obey the
summons of him to whom the appeal has been made, or of one delegated
by him, let him absolve the one excommunicated and thus he will
in no way incur the penalties prescribed; let him be careful,
however, not to forge an error to the detriment of another if
he wishes to escape canonical punishment.
CANON 48
Summary. Provision is made that no one may through frivolous
refusal deny or reject the jurisdiction of his judge.
Text. By a special prohibition it has been provided that
a sentence of excommunication be promulgated against no one without
a previous warning. Wishing to forestall any attempt on the part
of the one thus warned to avoid, under pretext of deceitful refusal
or appeal, the inquiry of the one giving the admonition, we decree
that, should he assert that he entertains a suspicion in regard
to the judge, let him in the presence of the judge indicate the
cause of his just suspicion, and let him with his opponent, or
if he has no opponent, with the judge, conjointly choose arbiters,
or if together they cannot agree, let them choose without ill
will two, he one and the judge the other, who may inquire into
the cause of the suspicion; and if they cannot come to an agreement,
let them ask for a third party, so that what two of them decide
may obtain greater weight. Let them know also that, by reason
of a strict precept enjoined by us in virtue of obedience under
witness of the divine judge, they are bound to execute this faithfully.
If the true cause of the suspicion has not been proved by them
within a reasonable period of time, let the judge use his jurisdiction;
but if it has been legitimately proved, then let the judge with
the consent of the one who suspected him commit the matter to
a competent person, or let him submit it to the superior, that
the latter may take such action in his regard as should be taken.
Moreover, in case the one warned should resort to an appeal, let
no heed be given to a provocation of this kind if from the evidence
of the case or from his confession or from another source his
guilt has been clearly established, since the remedy of appeal
was not instituted for the defense of iniquity but for the protection
of the innocent. If his guilt is doubtful, that he may not impede
the process of the judge by recourse to a frivolous appeal, let
him explain in the judge's presence the probable ground of the
appeal, namely, such a ground as, if proved, would be regarded
as valid. If he has an opponent, the cause of the appeal is to
be continued within a period fixed by the same judge, due consideration
being given to the distance, time, and nature of the business;
if h does not care to continue it, then, notwithstanding the appeal,
let the judge proceed with it. If there is no opponent and the
cause of the appeal has been proved before the superior judge,
let the latter exercise his jurisdiction. But, if the appellant
fails in his proof, then he case is to be returned to the judge
from whom he deceitfully 'appealed.
These two aforesaid decrees, however, we do not wish to be applied
to regulars, who have their own special observances.
CANON 49
Summary. The sentence of excommunication is not to be imposed
with a view of satisfying greed, and anyone so guilty is to be
severely punished.
Text. Under threat of the divine judge we absolutely forbid
that anyone, impelled solely by greed, dare bind one with the
chain of excommunication or absolve one so bound, especially in
those regions where it is customary, when the one excommunicated
is absolved impose a pecuniary punishment on him; and we decree
that when it is agreed that the sentence of excommunication was
an unjust one. The excommunicator be compelled by ecclesiastical
censure to restore the money thus extorted; and, unless he was
deceived by a probable error, let him make full compensation
for the injury sustained. If he fails to do this, let other penalties
be imposed.
CANON 50
Summary. The prohibitions against marriage in the second and
third degrees of affinity and against the union of the offspring
from second marriages to a relative of the first usband, are removed.
This prohibition does not apply beyond the fourth degree of consanguinity
and affinity.
Text. It must not be deemed reprehensible if human statutes
change sometimes with the change of time, especially when urgent
necessity or common interest demands it, since God himself has
changed in the New Testament some things that He had decreed in
the Old. Since, therefore, the prohibition against the contracting
of marriage in secundo et tertio genere affinitatis and
that against the union of the offspring from second marriages
to a relative of the first husband, frequently constitute a source
of difficulty and sometimes are a cause of danger to souls, that
by a cessation of the proibition the effect may cease also, we,
with the approval of the holy council, revoking previous enactments
in this matter, decree in the resent statute that such persons
may in the future contract marriage without hindrance. The prohibition
also is not in the future to affect marriages beyond the fourth
degree of consanguinity and affinity; since in degrees beyond
the fourth a prohibition of this kind cannot be generally observed
without grave inconvenience. This quaternary number agrees well
with the prohibition of corporal wedlock of which the Apostle
says that "the wife hath not power of her own body, but the
husband; and in like manner the husband also hath not power of
his own body, but the wife" (I Cor. 7: 4); because there
are four humors in the body, which consists of four elements.
Since therefore the prohibition of conjugal union is restricted
to the fourth degree, we wish that it remain so in perpetuum, notwithstanding the decrees already issued relative to this
matter either by others or by ourselves, and should anyone presume
to contract marriage contrary to this prohibition, no number of
years shall excuse him, since duration of time does not palliate
the gravity of sin but rather aggravates it, and his crimes are
the graver the longer he holds his unhappy soul in bondage .[
cf. I Lat, canon 5].
CANON 51
Summary. Clandestine marriages and witness to them by a priest
are forbidden. Marriages to be contracted must be published in
the churches by the priests so that, if legitimate impediments
exist, they may be made known. If doubt exists, let the contemplated
marriage be forbidden till the matter is cleared up.
Text. Since the prohibition of the conjugal union in the
three last degrees has been revoked, we wish that it be strictly
observed in the other degrees. Whence, following in the footsteps
of our predecessors, we absolutely forbid clandestine marriages;
and we forbid also that a priest presume to witness such. Wherefore,
extending to other localities generally the particular custom
that prevails in some, we decree that when marriages are to be
contracted they must be announced publicly in the churches by
the priests during a suitable and fixed time, so that if legitimate
impediments exist, they may be made known. Let the priests nevertheless
investigate whether any impediments exist. But when there is ground
for doubt concerning the contemplated union, let the marriage
be expressly forbidden until it is evident from reliable sources
what ought to be done in regard to it. But if anyone should presume
to contract a clandestine or forbidden marriage of this kind within
a prohibited degree, even through ignorance, the children from
such a union shall be considered illegitimate, nor shall the ignorance
of the parents be pleaded as an extenuating circumstance in their
behalf, since they by contracting such marriages appear not as
wanting in knowledge but rather as affecting ignorance. In like
manner the children shall be considered illegitimate if both parents,
knowing that a legitimate impediment exists, presume to contract
such a marriage in conspectu ecclesiae (not clandestinely)
in disregard of every prohibition. The parochial priest who deliberately
neglects to forbid such unions, or any regular priest who presumes
to witness them, let them be suspended from office for a period
of three years and, if the nature of their offense demands it,
let them be punished more severely. On those also who presume
to contract such marriages in a lawful degree, a condign punishment
is to be imposed. If anyone maliciously presents an impediment
for the purpose of frustrating a legitimate marriage, let him
not escape ecclesiastical punishment.
CANON 52
Summary. In the matter of consanguinity and affinity, hearsay
evidence is not to be relied on unless it comes from reputable
persons to whom uprightness is a precious asset.
Text. Through some necessity the common mode of procedure
in computing the degree of consanguinity and affinity has been
re placed by another, namely, hearsay testimony, since on account
of the shortness of human life eye-witnesses cannot be had in
the matter of reckoning to the seventh degree. But, since we have
learned from many instances and from experience that, in consequence
of this, legitimate marriages are beset with many dangers, we
decree that in this matter hearsay witnesses be not received in
the future, since the prohibition now does not extend beyond the
fourth degree, unless they be reputable persons to whom uprightness
is a precious asset and who before the dispute arose obtained
their testimony from those gone immediately before, not from one
indeed, since he would not suffice if he were living, but from
two at least, who must have been reliable persons, beyond suspicion
and of good faith, since it would be absurd to admit them if their
informants were worthy only of rejection. Not even if one person
has obtained his testimony from many, or if an unreliable person
has obtained his from men of good faith, must they be admitted
as many and suitable witnesses, since even in the ordinary judicial
processes the statement of one witness does not suffice, even
though he shine in all the splendor of gubernatorial dignity,
and, moreover, legitimate acts are denied to persons of a disreputable
character. Witnesses of this kind must declare on oath that in
giving their testimony they are not actuated by hatred, fear,
love, or self interest; let them designate persons by their names
or by a satisfactory description or circumlocution, and distinguish
by a clear computation each degree on both sides, and let them
include in their oath that they obtained their information from
their forefathers and believe it to be so. But neither do such
witnesses suffice unless they declare on oath that they have seen
persons who belonged to at least one of the aforesaid degrees
and who acknowledged themselves blood relatives. For it is more
tolerable that some who have been united contrary to the laws
of men be separated than that those who have been legitimately
united separate in violation of the laws of God.
CANON 53
Summary. Owners who commit their estates to people that pursuant
of their rites do not pay tithes, must be compelled to pay them
in full.
Text. In some localities there dwell people who according
to their rites are not accustomed to pay tithes, though they are
considered Christians. To these some owners entrust the cultivation
of their estates, in order to defraud the churches of tithes and
thus realize greater profits. Wishing, therefore, to safeguard
the churches against loss in this matter, we decree that the owners
may entrust to such people and in such a manner the cultivation
of their estates, but they must without argument pay to the churches
the tithes in full, and to this let them be compelled, if necessary,
by ecclesiastical censure. All tithes due by reason of the divine
law or by reason of an approved local custom must be paid.
CANON 54
Summary. The payment of tithes takes precedence over the payment
of taxes and other expenses, and those who invert this order are
to be punished.
Text. Since it is not in the power of man that the seed
yield a return to the sower, because according to the words of
the Apostle, "Neither he that planteth is anything, nor he
that watereth; but God who giveth the increase" (I Cor. 3:
7), the decayed seed producing much fruit, some impelled too much
by avarice strive to defraud in the matter of tithes, deducting
from the profits and first fruits taxes and other expenses on
which at times they thus escape the payment of tithes. But since
the Lord, as a sign of His universal dominion, formerly reserved
tithes to Himself by a special title, we, wishing to safeguard
the churches against loss and souls against danger, decree that
by the prerogative of general dominion the payment of tithes precedes
the payment of taxes and other expenses, or at least they to whom
the taxes and other expenses are paid but from which the tithes
have not been deducted, should be compelled by ecclesiastical
censure to pay the tithes to the churches to which they are legally
due, since the obligation that attaches to a thing passes with
the thing from one possessor to another.
CANON 55
Summary. The Cistercians and other monks must pay tithes to
the churches from strange lands or from lands they may acquire
in the future, even if they cultivate them with their own hands.
Text. Lately the abbots of the Cistercian order in general
chapter assembled wisely decided in reference to our warning,
that in the future the brethren of that order purchase no property
on which tithes are due to the churches, unless it be for the
purpose of establishing new monasteries. And if such possessions
have been given to them through the pious generosity of the faithful
or bought for them for the purpose of founding new monasteries,
they may commit their cultivation to others by whom the tithes
will be paid to the churches, lest by reason of their privileges
the churches be further oppressed. We decree, therefore, that
from strange lands or from lands that they may acquire in the
future, though they cultivate them with their own hands or at
their own expense, they pay the tithes to the churches to which
they were formerly paid, unless they make some other arrangement
with those churches. We therefore, holding this decree acceptable
and accepted, wish it to be extended also to other regulars who
enjoy similar privileges, and we ordain that the prelates of the
churches be more willing and energetic in punishing evil doers
and strive to observe their privileges better and more perfectly.
[Note by Schroeder: By the common law monks as well as laymen
were obliged pay tithes from the fruits of their estates. This
was the ancient discipline of the Church. The first who absolved
monks from the obligation of paying tithes from their landed possessions
seems to have been Gregory VII. Later, Paschal II exempted monks
and canons regular from the payment of tithes from lands that
they cultivated with their own hands. This privilege of Paschal
was granted primarily in favor of the Cistercian Order, which
in its beginnings was very poor. When later the order became immensely
wealthy, especially in landed possessions, this privilege became
the fruitful source of conflict between the Cistercian Order and
the bishops. Hence it was enacted in this decree that from all
strange lands and lands that may be acquired in the future, even
if cultivated with their own hands or at their own expense, tfie
Cistercians as well as other regulars who enjoy similar privileges,
must pay tithes to the churches to which they were formerly paid
or make some other arrangement with those churches. Thomassin, Vetus et nova ecclesiae discipline, P. III, lib. 1, cap.
9.]
CANON 56
Summary. It is forbidden to make contracts prejudicial to parochial
churches.
Text. Many regular and secular clerics, we understand,
when i sometimes they lease houses or grant fiefs, make a contract
prejudicial to parochial churches, namely, that the administrator
or feudal tenants pay the tithes to them and choose burial among
them. But, since this is prompted by avarice, we absolutely condemn
a contract of this kind and declare that whatever has been received
by means of such a contract must be returned to the parochial
church.
CANON 57
Summary. Only members of a religious order and those who have
given their possessions to the order, retaining for themselves
only the usufruct, may be buried during the period of an interdict.
To religious coming to an interdicted locality, only one church
may be opened, and that merely once a year.
Text. That the privileges which the Roman Church has granted
to some religious may be maintained in their entirety, we take
occasion to make clear some things in regard to them, lest being
misunderstood they lead to abuse, by reason of which they may
be rightly revoked, because he deserves to lose privileges who
abuses the benefits which they confer. The Apostolic See has granted
permission to some regulars that to those who have become members
of their order, ecclesiastical burial may not be denied if the
churches to which they belong should be under interdict, provided
they themselves are not excommunicated or nominally interdicted;
and they may, therefore, take their brethren, whom the prelates
of the churches are not permitted to bury from their churches,
to their own churches for burial, if they (the deceased confrères)
were not nominally under excommunication or interdict. By brethren
we understand both those who, having lived in the world, gave
themselves to their order and accepted its habit, and those who
gave their possessions to the order, retaining for their own maintenance
during life only the usufruct, who, however, may be buried from
non interdicted churches of regulars or others in which they may
choose to be buried; it is not, however, to be understood of those
who join their fraternity and contribute annually no more than
two or three denarii, for this would upset ecclesiastical order
and discipline. Yet these also obtain a certain remission granted
to them by the Apostolic See.
That other privilege also that has been granted to some regulars,
namely, that when any of their brethren who have been sent by
them to collect (alms), arrive in any city, fortified town, or
village, if perchance that place be under interdict, in view of
their joyful arrival the churches may be opened once a year for
the celebration of the divine offices for those not under excommunication,
we wish tt) be understood thus: that in each city, fortified town,
or village, only one church of the same order may, as has been
said, be opened to the brethren once a year; for though the statement,
that on their joyful arrival the churches may be opened, is plural,
yet it is not to be understood as referring to the churches of
the same place separately, but to the churches of the aforesaid
places collectively otherwise, if they should visit each church
of the same place, the interdict would be too much disregarded.
Whoever shall presume to act contrary to these enactments, let
him be subject to severe penalties.[cf. III Lat, canon 9]
CANON 58
Summary. During a general interdict the bishops may within
closed doors celebrate the divine services for those not affected
by the interdict.
Text. The privilege that has been granted to some religious
we concede also to bishops, that, when the entire territory is
under Interdict, those excommunicated and interdicted being excluded,
they may sometimes with the doors closed, in a low voice and without
the ringing of bells, celebrate the divine offices, unless this
is expressly covered by the interdict. But we grant this to those
only who in no way shared in the cause of the interdict or injected
treachery or fraud, drawing out such a brief period to iniquitous
loss.
CANON 59
Summary. Religious are forbidden to go security for or to borrow
money from anyone beyond a fixed sum without the consent of the
abbot or the greater part of the chapter.
Text. What has been forbidden by the Apostolic See to some
religious orders, we wish and command to be extended to all, namely,
that no religious may, without the permission of the abbot and
of the greater part of his chapter, go security for anyone or
borrow money from anyone beyond an amount fixed by common agreement;
otherwise the convent is not held in any degree responsible for
such things, unless perchance it is evident that his action would
redound to the advantage of the convent. Anyone who presumes to
act contrary to this, let him be subject to severe discipline.
CANON 60
Summary. Abbots are forbidden to interfere in matters that
belong to the jurisdiction of the bishops.
Text. From different parts of the world complaints of bishops
come to us in regard to grave excesses of some abbots, who, not
content within their own spheres, extend their hands to those
things that concern the episcopal office, deciding matrimonial
cases, imposing public penances, granting letters of indulgences,
and similar things, whence it sometimes happens that the episcopal
authority is looked upon by many as something of trifling importance.
Wishing, therefore, in these matters to safeguard the dignity
of the bishops and the welfare of the abbots, we absolutely forbid
in the present decree that abbots presume to overreach themselves
in such matters if they wish to escape canonical penalties, unless
they can by a special concession or other legitimate reason defend
themselves in matters of this kind.
CANON 61
Summary. Religious are forbidden to receive churches and tithes
from laymen without the consent of the bishops. In churches that
do not belong to them pleno jure, the priests must be appointed
by the bishops on presentation.
Text. In the Lateran Council regulars were forbidden to
receive churches and tithes from the hands of laymen without the
consent of the bishops, and under no circumstances to admit ad
divina those excommunicated or nominally under interdict.
[cf. III Lat, canon 9] Wishing to curb this evil more effectively
and provide that transgressors meet with condign punishment, we
decree that in churches that do not pleno jure belong to
them, they present to the bishops priests to be appointed in accordance
with the statutes of that council, that they may be responsible
to them in those things that pertain to the cura animarum; in temporal affairs, however, let them render a satisfactory
account to the monasteries. Those who have been appointed, let
them not dare remove without the approval of the bishops. We add,
moreover, that care be taken to present such priests as are known
for their uprightness and ability or whom the probable testimony
of the bishops recommends.
CANON 62
Summary. Relics are not to be sold or put on exhibition, lest
the people be deceived in regard to them. Seekers of alms are
not to be admitted unless they can exhibit letters of the Apostolic
See or of the bishops, and they may not preach anything not contained
in the letters. On the occasion of the dedication of a-church,
an indulgence of not more than one year may be granted; on the
anniversary of the dedication-, it may not exceed forty days.
Text. From the fact that some expose for sale and exhibit promiscuously
the relics of saints, great injury is sustained by the Christian
religion. That this may not occur hereafter, we ordain in the
present decree that in the future old relics may not be exhibited
outside of a vessel or exposed for sale. And let no one presume
to venerate publicly new ones unless they have been approved by
the Roman pontiff. In the future prelates shall not permit those
who come to their churches causa venerationis to be deceived
by worthless fabrications or false documents as has been done
in many places for the sake of gain. We forbid also that seekers (quaestores) of alms, some of whom, misrepresenting themselves,
preach certain abuses, be admitted, unless they exhibit genuine
letters either of the Apostolic See or of the diocesan bishop,
in which case they may not preach anything to the people but what
is contained in those letters. We give herewith a form which the
Apostolic See commonly uses in granting such letters, that the
diocesan bishops may model their own upon it. The following is
the form:
Forma litterarum praedicatorum
Quoniam, ut ait Apostolus, omnes stabimus ante tribunal Christi,
recepturi prout in corpore gessimus, sive bonum sive malum fuerit,
oportet nos diem messionis extremae misericordiae operibus praevenire,
ac aeternorum intuitu seminare in terris quod reddente Domino
cum multiplicato fructu colligere debeamus in caelis; firmain
spem, fiduciamque tenentes, quoniam "qui parce seminat, parce
et metet, et qui seminat in benedictionibus, de benedictionibus
et metet in vitam aeternam." Cum igitur ad sustentationem
fratrum et egenorum ad tale confluentium hospitals propriae non
suppetant facultates, universitatem vestram monemus et exhortamur
in Domino atque in remissionem vobis in' jungimus peccatorum,
quatenus de bonis a Deo vobis collatis pias eleemosynas et grata
eis caritatis subsidia erogatis, ut per subventionem vestram ipsorum
inopiae consulatur, et vos per haec et per alia bona, quae Domino
inspirante feceritis, ad aeterna possitis gaudia pervenire.
Those who are assigned to collect alms must be upright and discreet,
must not seek lodging for the night in taverns or in other unbecoming
places, nor make useless and extravagant expenses, and must avoid
absolutely the wearing of the habit of a false religious.
Since, through indiscreet and superfluous indulgences which some
prelates of churches do not hesitate to grant, contempt is brought
on the keys of the Church, and the penitential discipline is weakened,
we decree that on the occasion of the dedication of a church an
indulgence of not more than one year be granted, whether it be
dedicated by one bishop only or by many, and on the anniversary
of the dedication the remission granted for penances enjoined
is not to exceed forty days. We command also that in each case
this number of days be made the rule in issuing letters of indulgences
which are granted from time to time, since the Roman pontiff who
possesses the plenitude of power customarily observes this rule
in such matters .
CANON 63
Summary. It is simoniacal to demand something for the consecration
of bishops, the blessing of abbots, and the ordination of clerics;
nor is custom any excuse.
Text. We have learned with certainty that in many places
and by many persons exactions and base extortions are made for
the consecration of bishops, the blessing of abbots, and the ordination
of clerics, and that a tax is fixed as to how much this one or
that one is to receive and how much this one or that one is to
pay; and what is worse, some endeavor to defend such baseness
and depravity by an appeal to a custom of long standing. Therefore,
wishing to abolish such abuse, we absolutely condemn a custom
of this kind, which ought rather to be called corruption, firmly
decreeing that neither for those conferring nor for the things
conferred shall anyone presume to demand or to extort something
under any pretext whatsoever. Otherwise both he that has received
and he that has given a price of this kind, shall share the condemnation
of Giezi and Simon. [cf. IV Kings 5:20-27, and Acts 8:9-24].
CANON 64
Summary. Religious are not to be received for a price. If this
happens, both the one receiving and the one received shall, without
hope of restoration, be removed from the community. Those who
were received in such a manner before the publication of this
decree, must be placed in other communities of the same order.
Text. Since the stain of simony has so infected many nuns
that scarcely any are received into the community without a price,
doing this on the plea of poverty to conceal that evil, we strictly
forbid that this be done in the future, decreeing that whoever
in the future shall be guilty of such irregularity, both the one
receiving and the one received, whether subject or superioress,
shall, without hope of restoration, be removed from their monastery
to one of stricter observance to do penance for the remainder
of their life. Those nuns, however, who have been so received
before the publication of this decree, are to be removed from
the monasteries which they entered in a wrong manner and placed
in others of the same order. But if on account of lack of room
they cannot perchance be conveniently placed elsewhere, lest they
should to their own loss become wanderers in the world, let them
be received anew per modum dispensationis in the same monastery,
and from the priority of places which they held in the community
let them be assigned to lower ones. This we decree is to be observed
also with regar d to monks and other regulars. But, lest they
should attempt to excuse themselves on grounds of simplicity or
ignorance, we command the bishops to see to it that this decree
is published every year throughout their diocese.
CANON 65
Summary. Bishops are not to demand anything for the appointment
of pastors. Entrance into a monastery and burial must be free.
Text. We have heard it said of some bishops that on the
death of rectors of churches they place the churches under interdict
and will not allow any persons to be appointed to the vacancies
till a certain sum of money has been paid them. Moreover, when
a soldier or cleric enters a monastery or chooses to be buried
among religious, though he has left nothing to the religious institution,
difficulties and villainy are forced into service till something
in the nature of a gift comes into their hands. Since, therefore,
according to the Apostle we must abstain not only from evil but
also from every appearance of evil, we absolutely forbid exactions
of this kind. If any transgressor be found, let him restore double
the amount exacted; this is to be placed faithfully at the disposal
of those localities to whose detriment the exactions were made.
CANON 66
Summary. The sacraments must be administered freely. The bishops
should exhort the people to retain pious customs.
Text. It has frequently come to the ears of the Apostolic
See that some clerics demand and extort money for burials, nuptial
blessings, and similar things, and, if perchance their cupidity
is not given satisfaction, they fraudulently interpose fictitious
impediments. On the other hand, some laymen, under the pretext
of piety but really on heretical grounds, strive to suppress a
laudable custom introduced by the pious devotion of the faithful
in behalf of the church (that is, of giving freely something for
ecclesiastical services rendered). Wherefore, we forbid that such
evil exactions be made in these matters, and on the other hand
command that pious customs be observed, decreeing that the sacraments
of the Church be administered freely and that those who endeavor
maliciously to change a laudable custom be restrained by the bishops
of the locality when once the truth is known.
CANON 67
Summary. Jews should be compelled to make satisfaction for
the tithes and offerings e churches, which the Christians supplied
before their properties fell into of the Jews.
Text. The more the Christians are restrained from the practice
of usury, the more are they oppressed in this matter by the treachery
of the Jews, so that in a short time they exhaust the resources
of the Christians. Wishing, therefore, in this matter to protect
the Christians against cruel oppression by the Jews, we ordain
in this decree that if in the future under any pretext Jews extort
from Christians oppressive and immoderate interest, the partnership
of the Christians shall be denied them till they have made suitable
satisfaction for their excesses. The Christians also, every appeal
being set aside, shall, if necessary, be compelled by ecclesiastical
censure to abstain from all commercial intercourse with them.
We command the princes not to be hostile to the Christians on
this account, but rather to strive to hinder the Jews from practicing
such excesses. Lastly, we decree that the Jews be compelled by
the same punishment (avoidance of commercial intercourse) to make
satisfaction for the tithes and offerings due to the churches,
which the Christians were accustomed to supply from their houses
and other possessions before these properties, under whatever
title, fell into the hands of the Jews, that thus the churches
may be safeguarded against loss.
CANON 68
Summary. Jews and Saracens of both sexes in every Christian
province must be distinguished from the Christian by a difference
of dress. On Passion Sunday and the last three days of Holy Week
they may not appear in public.
Text: In some provinces a difference in dress distinguishes
the Jews or Saracens from the Christians, but in certain others
such a confusion has grown up that they cannot be distinguished
by any difference. Thus it happens at times that through error
Christians have relations with the women of Jews or Saracens,
and Jews and Saracens with Christian women. Therefore, that they
may not, under pretext of error of this sort, excuse themselves
in the future for the excesses of such prohibited intercourse,
we decree that such Jews and Saracens of both sexes in every Christian
province and at all times shall be marked off in the eyes of the
public from other peoples through the character of their dress.
Particularly, since it may be read in the writings of Moses [Numbers
15:37-41], that this very law has been enjoined upon them.
Moreover, during the last three days before Easter and especially
on Good Friday, they shall not go forth in public at all, for
the reason that some of them on these very days, as we hear, do
not blush to go forth better dressed and are not afraid to mock
the Christians who maintain the memory of the most holy Passion
by wearing signs of mourning.
This, however, we forbid most severely, that any one should presume
at all to break forth in insult to the Redeemer. And since we
ought not to ignore any insult to Him who blotted out our disgraceful
deeds, we command that such impudent fellows be checked by the
secular princes by imposing them proper punishment so that they
shall not at all presume to blaspheme Him who was crucified for
us.
[Note by Schroeder: In 581 the Synod of Macon enacted in canon
14 that from Thursday in Holy Week until Easter Sunday, .Jews
may not in accordance with a decision of King Childebert appear
in the streets and in public places. Mansi, IX, 934; Hefele-Leclercq,
111, 204. In 1227 the Synod of Narbonne in canon 3 ruled: "That
Jews may be distinguished from others, we decree and emphatically
command that in the center of the breast (of their garments) they
shall wear an oval badge, the measure of one finger in width and
one half a palm in height. We forbid them moreover, to work publicly
on Sundays and on festivals. And lest they scandalize Christians
or be scandalized by Christians, we wish and ordain that during
Holy Week they shall not leave their houses at all except in case
of urgent necessity, and the prelates shall during that week especially
have them guarded from vexation by the Christians." Mansi,
XXIII, 22; Hefele-Leclercq V 1453. Many decrees similar to these
in content were issued by synods before and after this Lateran
Council. Hefele-Leclercq, V and VI; Grayzel, The Church and
the Jews in the XIlIth Century, Philadelphia, 1933.]
CANON 69
Summary. Jews are not to be given public offices. Anyone
instrumental in doing this is to be punished. A Jewish official
is to be denied all intercourse with Christians.
Text. Since it is absurd that a blasphemer of Christ exercise
authority over Christians, we on account of the boldness of transgressors
renew in this general council what the Synod of Toledo (589) wisely
enacted in this matter, prohibiting Jews from being given preference
in the matter of public offices, since in such capacity they are
most troublesome to the Christians. But if anyone should commit
such an office to them, let him, after previous warning, be restrained
by such punishment as seems proper by the provincial synod which
we command to be celebrated every year. The official, however,
shall be denied the commercial and other intercourse of the Christians,
till in the judgment of the bishop all that he acquired from the
Christians from the time he assumed office be restored for the
needs of the Christian poor, and the office that he irreverently
assumed let him lose with shame. The same we extend also to pagans. [Mansi, IX, 995; Hefele-Leclercq, III, 7.27. This canon 14
of Toledo was frequently renewed.]
CANON 70
Summary. Jews who have received baptism are to be restrained
by the prelates from returning to their former rite.
Text. Some (Jews), we understand, who voluntarily approached
the waters of holy baptism, do not entirely cast off the old man
that they may more perfectly put on the new one, because, retaining
remnants of the former rite, they obscure by such a mixture the
beauty of the Christian religion. But since it is written: "Accursed
is the man that goeth on the two ways" (Ecclus. 2:14), and
"a garment that is woven together of woolen and linen"
(Deut. 22: ii) ought not to be put on, we decree that such persons
be in every way restrained b the prelates from the observance
of the former rite, that, having given themselves of their own
free will to the Christian religion, salutary coercive action
may preserve them in its observance, since not to know the way
of the Lord is a lesser evil than to retrace one's steps after
it is known.
HOLY LAND DECREES
Summary. A series of decrees dealing with the preparation of
a crusade to the Holy Land.
Text. Desiring with an ardent desire to liberate the Holy
Land from the hands of the ungodly, we decree with the advice
of prudent men who are fully familiar with the circumstances of
the times, and with the approval of the council, that all who
have taken the cross and have decided to cross the sea, hold themselves
so prepared that they may, on June 1 of the year after next (1217),
come together in the Kingdom of Sicily, some at Brundusium and
others at Messana, where, God willing, we (the Pope) will be present
personally to order and to bestow on the Christian army the divine
and Apostolic blessing. Those who decide to make the journey by
land, should strive to hold themselves prepared for the same time;
for their aid and guidance we shall in the meantime appoint a
competent legate a latere. Priests and other clerics who
are with the Christian army, subjects as well as prelates, must
be diligent in prayer and exhortation, teaching them (the crusaders)
by word and example that they have always before their eyes the
fear and love of God, lest they say or do something that might
offend the majesty of the eternal King. And should any have fallen
into sin, let them quickly rise again through true repentance,
practicing humility both interiorly and exteriorly, observing
moderation in food as well as in clothing, avoiding dissensions
and emulations, and divesting themselves of all malice and ill
will, that being thus fortified with spiritual and material arms,
they may fight with greater success against the enemies of the
faith, not indeed relying on their own strength but putting their
trust in the power of God. To the clerics we grant for a period
of three years as complete an enjoyment of their benefices as
if they actually resided in them, and they may, if necessary,
even give them as pledges during this time. Therefore, that this
undertaking may not be impeded or retarded, we strictly command
all prelates that each one in his own territory induce those who
have laid aside the crusader's cross to resume it, and carefully
to admonish them and others who have taken the cross, as well
as those who happen to be engaged for this purpose, to renew their
vows to God, and if necessary to compel them by excommunication
and interdict to abandon all delay.
Moreover, that nothing connected with the affairs of our Lord
Jesus Christ be omitted, we wish and command that patriarchs,
archbishops, bishops, abbots, and others who have the care of
souls, diligently explain the meaning of the crusade to those
committed to them, adjuring-through the Father, Son, and Holy
Ghost, one, only true, and eternal God-kings, dukes, princes,
marquises, counts, barons, and other prominent men, as well as
cities, villages, and towns, that those who cannot go personally
to the Holy Land, will furnish a suitable number of soldiers and,
for a period of three years, in proportion to their resources,
will bear the necessary expenses connected therewith for the remission
of their sins, as we have made known in the general letters already
sent over the world and as will be,exprcssed in greater detail
below. In this remission we wish not only those to participate
who for this purpose furnish their own ships, but those also who
undertake to build ships. To those declining to render aid, if
perchance any should be found to be so ungrateful to God, the
Apostolic See firmly protests that on the last day they will be
held to render an account to us in the presence of a terrible
judge. Let them first consider with what security they can appear
in the presence of the only begotten Son of God, Jesus Christ,
into whose hands the Father has given all things, if in this matter
they refuse to serve Him who was crucified for sinners, by whose
favor they live, by whose benefits they are sustained, and by
whose blood they were redeemed.
But, lest we should seem to place grave and unbearable burdens
on the shoulders of the people, we ourselves (the Pope) donate
to the cause what we have been able to save by strict economy,
30,000 pounds, besides a ship to convey the crusaders from Rome
and vicinity and 3,000 marks silver, the remnant of alms received
from the faithful. The remainder we have given to Albert patriarch
of Jerusalem, and to the masters of the Temple and Hospital for
the necessities of the Holy Land. With the approval of the council
we further decree that absolutely all clerics, subjects as well
as superiors, shall, in aid of the Holy Land and for a period
of three years, pay into the hands of those appointed by the Apostolic
See for this purpose, one twentieth part of ecclesiastical revenues;
some religious orders only being excepted and those (clerics)
also who take or already have taken the crusader's cross and are
about to set out personally. We and our brethren, the cardinals
of the Holy Roman Church, will pay one-tenth of our revenues.
All are bound to the faithful observance of this under penalty
of excommunication, so that those who deliberately commit fraud
in this matter will incur that penalty.
Since by the just judgment of the heavenly King it is only right
that those who are associated with a good cause should enjoy a
special privilege, we exempt the crusaders from collections, taxes,
and other assessments. Their persons and possessions, after they
have taken the cross, we take under the protection of Blessed
Peter and our own, decreeing that they stand under the protection
o f the archbishops, bishops, and all the prelates of the Church.
Besides, special protectors will be appointed, and, till their
return or till their death shall have been certified, they shall
remain unmolested, and if anyone shall presume the contrary, let
him be restrained by ecclesiastical censure.
In the case of crusaders who are bound under oath to pay interest,
we command that their creditors be compelled to cancel the oath
given and to cease exacting interest. Should any creditor force
the payment of interest, we command that he be similarly forced
to make restitution. We command also that Jews be compelled by
the secular power to cancel interest, and, till they have done
so, intercourse with them must be absolutely denied them by all
Christians under penalty of excommunication. For those who cannot
be their departure pay their debts to the Jews, the secular princes
shall provide such a delay that from the time of their departure
till their return or till their death is known, they shall not
be embarrassed with the inconvenience of paying interest. If a
Jew has received security (for example, a piece of ground) for
such a debt, he must, after deducting his own expenses, pay to
the owner the income from such security. Prelates who manifest
negligence in obtaining justice for the crusaders and their servants,
shall be subject to severe penalty.
Since the corsairs and pirates too vehemently impede assistance
to the Holy Land by capturing and robbing those who go there and
those returning, we excommunicate them and their principal abetters
and protectors, forbidding under threat of anathema that anyone
knowingly hold intercourse with them in any contract of buying
and selling, and enjoin upon the rulers of cities and their localities
that they check and turn them away from this iniquity. And since
an unwillingness to disturb the perverse is nothing else than
to favor them, and is also an indication of secret association
with them on the part of those who do not resist manifest crime,
we wish and command that severe ecclesiastical punishment be imposed
by the prelates on their persons and lands. We excommunicate and
anathematize, moreover, those false and ungodly Christians who
furnish the enemies of Christ and the Christian people with arms,
iron, and wood for the construction of ships; those also who sell
them ships and who in the ships of the Saracens hold the post
of pilot, or in any other way give them aid or advice to the detriment
of the Holy Land; and we decree that their possessions be confiscated
and they themselves become the slaves of their captors. We command
that this sentence be publicly announced in all maritime cities
on all Sundays and festival days, and that to such people the
church be not opened till they return all that they have obtained
in so reprehensible a traffic and give the same amount of their
own -in aid of the Holy Land. In case they are not able to pay,
then let them be punished in other ways, that by their chastisement
others may be deterred from undertaking similar pursuits.
Furthermore, under penalty of anathema, we forbid all Christians
for a period of four years to send their ships to Oriental countries,
inhabited by the Saracens, in order that a greater number of ships
may be available to those who wish to go to the aid of the Holy
Land, and that to the Saracens may be denied the benefits that
they usually reap from such commercial intercourse.
Though tournaments have been, under certain penalties, generally
forbidden by different councils, since however at this time they
are a serious obstacle to the success of the crusade, we strictly
prohibit em under penalty of excommunication for a period of three
years.
But, since for the success of this undertaking it is above all
else necessary that princes and Christian people maintain peace
among themselves, we decree with the advice of the holy council
that for four years peace be observed in the whole Christian world,
so that through the prelates discordant elements may be brought
together in the fulness of peace, or at least to the strict observance
of the truce. Those who refuse to acquiesce in this, are to be
compelled by excommunication and interdict, unless the malice
that inspired their wrongdoings was such that they ought not to
enjoy such peace. But, if by chance they despise ecclesiastical
censure, they have every reason to fear lest by the authority
of the Church the secular power will be invoked against them as
disturbers of the affairs of the One crucified.
We, therefore, by the mercy of the omnipotent God, trusting in
the authority of the Blessed Apostles Peter and Paul, in virtue
of that power of binding and loosing which God has conferred on
us, though unworthy, grant to all who aid in this work personally
and at their own expense, a full remission of their sins which
they ,have sincerely repented and orally confessed, and promise
them when the just shall receive their reward an increase of eternal
happiness. To those who do not personally go to the Holy Land,
but at their own expense send there as many suitable men as their
means will permit, and to those also who go personally but at
the expense of others, we grant a full remission of their sins.
Participants of this remission are, moreover, all who in proportion
to their means contribute to the aid of the Holy Land, or in regard
to what has been said give opportune advice and assistance. Finally,
to all who in a spirit of piety aid in bringing to a successful
issue this holy under. taking, this holy and general council imparts
the benefits of its prayers and blessings that they may advance
worthily to salvation. Amen.
From H. J. Schroeder, Disciplinary Decrees of the General Councils:
Text, Translation and Commentary, (St. Louis: B. Herder, 1937).
pp. 236-296.
NOTE 1: B. Herder's list was bought by TAN books, of Rockford
IL. TAN confirmed that US copyright was not renewed after the
statuary 28 years and that the text is now in the public domain
in the US.]
NOTE 2: Fr. Schroeder accompanied the text with a commentary which,
while well informed, was dominated by a concern to defend Catholic
positions of his own time, and contained, moreover, a number of
verbal attacks on the Orthodox churches. This commentary has not
been reproduced here.]
This text is part of the Internet Medieval Source Book. The Sourcebook is a collection of public domain and copy-permitted texts related to medieval and Byzantine history.
Unless otherwise indicated the specific electronic form of the document is copyright. Permission is granted for electronic copying, distribution in print form for educational purposes and personal use. If you do reduplicate the document, indicate the source. No permission is granted for commercial use.
(c)Paul Halsall Mar 1996
halsall@murray.fordham.edu
The Internet History Sourcebooks Project is located at the History Department of Fordham University, New York. The Internet
Medieval Sourcebook, and other medieval components of the project, are located at
the Fordham University Center
for Medieval Studies.The IHSP recognizes the contribution of Fordham University, the
Fordham University History Department, and the Fordham Center for Medieval Studies in
providing web space and server support for the project. The IHSP is a project independent of Fordham University. Although the IHSP seeks to follow all applicable copyright law, Fordham University is not
the institutional owner, and is not liable as the result of any legal action.
© Site Concept and Design: Paul Halsall created 26 Jan 1996: latest revision 15 November 2024 [CV]
|