Mr. Disraeli was then Prime Minister, and treated the matter very lightly. He declared,
in reply to a statement that persons had been tortured as well as killed, that he doubted
whether torture was practised among a people "who generally terminated their
connection with culprits in a more expeditious manner." He spoke of the Circassians
who had taken a large share in the plunder and killing of the Bulgarians as "settlers
with a great stake in the country." His light manner of speaking on the subject
irritated Members on both sides of the House, who recognised that if my statements were
true they constituted a damning charge against Turkish methods of government in Bulgaria,
and demanded at least serious examination. My old friend, Professor Hunter, in the House
of Commons said that he knew me as a "slow-minded man, who would not make statements
of that kind without being satisfied of the truth."
Mr. (afterwards Sir John) Robinson, of the Daily News, sent me a telegram reporting
what Mr. Disraeli had said and adding that he desired full explanations. Thereupon I saw
various friends, and especially Dr. Long and Dr. Washburn, who furnished me with
translations of a mass of correspondence, from which I wrote a second and longer letter to
the Daily News. In my first letter I gave the names of thirty-seven villages which had
been destroyed and whose inhabitants had been tortured or killed. In the second letter,
written on June 30th, I brought the number of destroyed villages up to sixty, and stated
that I had seen an official report which estimated the number of persons killed at 12,000.
It should be understood that at this time there was no revolt in Bulgaria, though there
had been considerable expression of discontent. The idea of the Turks was to crush out the
spirit of the Bulgarian people, and thus prevent revolt. In the two letters mentioned I
had given the names of the sixty villages which had been destroyed. One London journal,
which got into trouble with Mr. Labouchere of Truth, boldly asserted that the names of
these villages did not figure in any known map. The statement may have been true of
English maps, because the declaration of Mr. Schuyler, the United States Consul-General
was not without a basis of truth, that for the United States and the British Empire I was
the discoverer of the existence of Bulgaria. I replied to the statement that the villages
were as easily identified as if I had given the names of Yorkshire or Devonshire villages,
and I urged that a Commission should be sent out by H.M. Government to make a report on
the matter. The publication of the second letter still further aroused the British people.
These letters, in the words of Mr. Glastone, "first sounded the alarm in
Europe."
Meanwhile at my request, Mr. Robinson sent Mr. MacGahan, an Irish-American of great
experience and fine character, to Bulgaria to report more fully than I had been able to
do. There was no question of my going, and that for two reasons. First, that I was then
fully occupied with professional work, and secondly, that beyond doubt difficulties would
have been placed in my way by the Turkish Government; probably they would even have
refused to give me the necessary local passport. The selection of Mr. MacGahan was a happy
one. He was a friend of Mr. Schuyler's. Both of them had been in Central Asia and knew
something of Russia, and neither of them could be charged with having any prejudice
against the Turks. Mr. Schuyler went on behalf of his Government to make a report, and Mr.
MacGahan accompanied him.
One of the first places they visited was Batak, the destruction of which had been
mentioned in my first letter. From thence MacGahan sent me by private messenger a
telegram, which came as a thunderbolt to the British public. Its contents were so horrible
that I recognized at once Constantinople. I therefore sent it by letter to be dispatched
from Bucarest. It was followed a day or two afterwards by a letter which I sent likewise
by Bucarest. This letter, which was dated 2nd August, and appeared in the Daily News about
a week later, created a profound sensation, not only in Great Britain but throughout
Europe. It was at once a series of pictures describing with photographic accuracy what the
observers had seen and a mass of the most ghastly stories they had heard on trustworthy
authority. They had seen dogs feeding on human remains, heaps of human skulls, skeletons
nearly entire, rotting clothing, human hair, and flesh putrid and Iying in one foul heap.
They saw the town with not a roof left, with women here and there wailing their dead amid
the ruins. They examined the heap and found that the skulls and skeletons were all small
and that the clothing was that of women and girls. MacGahan counted a hundred skulls
immediately around him. The skeletons were headless, showing that these victims had been
beheaded. Further on they saw the skeletons of two little children lying side by side with
frightful sabre cuts on their little skulls. MacGahan remarked that the number of children
killed in these massacres was something enormous. They heard on trustworthy authority from
eye-witnesses that they were often spiked on bayonets. There was not a house beneath the
ruins of which he and Mr. Schuyler did not see human remains, and the streets were strewn
with them. When they drew nigh the church they found the ground covered with skeletons and
lots of putrid flesh. In the church itself the sight was so appalling that I do not care
to reproduce the terrible description given by Mr. MacGahan.
Batak, where these horrors occurred, is situated about thirty miles from Tartar
Bazarjik, which is on the railway and on a spur of the Rhodope Mountains. It was a
thriving town, rich and prosperous in comparison with neighboring Moslem villages. Its
population previous to the massacres was about 9,000. MacGahan remarks that its prosperity
had excited the envy and jealousy of its Moslem neighbours. I elsewhere remark that, in
all the Moslem atrocities, Chiot, Bulgarian, and Armenian, the principal incentive has
been the larger prosperity of the Christian population; for, in spite of centuries of
oppression and plunder, Christian industry and Christian morality everywhere make for
national wealth and intelligence. . . .
Source:
From: Sir Edwin Pears, Forty Years in Constantinople, 1873-1915, (New York: D.
Appleton and Co., 1916), pp. 16-19, reprinted in Alfred J. Bannan and Achilles Edelenyi,
eds., Documentary History of Eastern Europe, (New York: Twayne Publishers, 1970),
pp. 191-194.
Scanned by Jerome S. Arkenberg, Cal. State Fullerton. The text has been modernized by
Prof. Arkenberg.
