An Epitome 
  Book I, Chapter 1. Of the Division of Labor: 
  THE greatest
    improvement in the productive powers of labor, and the greater part of the skill,
    dexterity, and judgment with which it is anywhere directed, or applied, seem to have been
    the effects of the division of labor....
  To take an example, therefore, the trade of the
    pin-maker; a workman not educated to this business, nor acquainted with the use of the
    machinery employed in it, could scarce, perhaps, with his utmost industry, make one pin in
    a day, and certainly could not make twenty. But in the way in which this business is now
    carried on, not only the whole work is a peculiar trade, but it is divided into a number
    of branches, of which the greater part are likewise peculiar trades. One man draws out the
    wire, another straights it, a third cuts it, a fourth points it, a fifth grinds it at the
    top for receiving, the head; to make the head requires two or three distinct operations;
    to put it on is a peculiar business, to whiten the pins is another; it is even a trade by
    itself to put them into the paper; and the important business of making a pin is, in this
    manner, divided into about eighteen distinct operations, which, in some factories, are all
    performed by distinct hands, though in others the same man will sometimes perform two or
    three of them. I have seen a small manufactory of this kind where ten men only were employed, and
    where some of them consequently performed two or three distinct operations. But though
    they were very poor, and therefore but indifferently accommodated with the necessary
    machinery, they could, when they exerted themselves, make among them about twelve pounds
    of pins in a day. There are in a pound upwards of four thousand pins of a middling size.
    Those ten persons, therefore, could make among them upwards of forty-eight thousand pins
    in a day. Each person, therefore, making a tenth part of forty-eight thousand pins, might
    be considered as making four thousand eight hundred pins in a day. But if they had all
    wrought separately and independently, and without any of them having been educated to this
    peculiar business, they certainly could not each of them have made twenty, perhaps not one
    pin in a day; that is, certainly, not the two hundred and fortieth, perhaps not the four
    thousand eight hundredth part of what they are at present capable of performing, in
    consequence of a proper division and combination of their different operations....
  The division of labor, so far as it can be introduced, occasions, in every art, a
    proportionable increase of the productive powers of labor. The separation of different
    trades and employments from one another seems to have taken place in consequence of this
    advantage. This separation, too, is generally called furthest in those countries which
    enjoy the highest degree of industry and improvement; what is the work of one man in a
    rude state of society being generally that of several in an improved one.....
  This great
    increase of the quantity of work which, in consequence of the division of labor, the same
    number of people are capable of performing, is owing to three different circumstances; first,
    to the increase of dexterity in every particular workman; secondly, to the saving
    of the time which is commonly lost in passing from one species of work to another; and lastly,
    to the invention of a great number of machines which facilitate and abridge labor, and
    enable one man to do the work of many....
  It is the great multiplication of the productions of all the different arts, in
    consequence of the division of labor, which occasions, in a well-governed society, that universal
      opulence which extends itself to the lowest ranks of the people. Every workman has a
    great quantity of his own work to dispose of beyond what he himself has occasion for; and
    every other workman being exactly in the same situation, he is enabled to exchange a great
    quantity of his own goods for a great quantity, or, what comes to the same thing, for the
    price of a great quantity of theirs. He supplies them abundantly with what they have
    occasion for, and they accommodate him as amply with what he has occasion for, and a
    general plenty diffuses itself through all the different ranks of the society....
  Book I, Chapter 2. Of the
    Principle which gives occasion to the Division of Labor: 
  THIS division of labor, from
    which so many advantages are derived, is not originally the effect of any human wisdom,
    which foresees and intends that universal opulence to which it gives occasion. It is the
    necessary, though very slow and gradual consequence of a certain propensity in human
    nature which has in view no such extensive utility; the propensity to truck, barter, and
    exchange one thing for another..... 
  Man has almost constant occasion for the help of his
    brethren, and it is in vain for him to expect it from their benevolence only. He will be
    more likely to prevail if he can interest their self-love in his favor, and show them that
    it is for their own advantage to do for him what he requires of them. Whoever offers to
    another a bargain of any kind, proposes to do this. Give me that which I want, and you
    shall have this which you want, is the meaning of every such offer; and it is in this
    manner that we obtain from one another the far greater art of those good offices which we
    stand in need of. It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker
    that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest.As it is by treaty, by barter, and by purchase that we obtain from one another the
    greater part of those mutual good offices which we stand in need of, so it is this same
    trucking disposition which originally gives occasion to the division of labor. In a tribe
    of hunters or shepherds a particular person makes bows and arrows, for example, with more
    readiness and dexterity than any other. He frequently exchanges them for cattle or for
    venison with his companions; and he finds at last that he can in this manner get more
    cattle and venison than if he himself went to the field to catch them. From a regard to
    his own interest, therefore, the making of bows and arrows grows to be his chief business,
    and he becomes a sort of armorer, etc......
  Book I, Chapter 4. Of the
    Origin and Use of Money: 
  WHEN the division of labor has been once thoroughly
    established, it is but a very small part of a man's wants which the produce of his own
    labor can supply. He supplies the far greater part of them by exchanging that surplus part
    of the produce of his own labor, which is over and above his own consumption, for such
    parts of the produce of other men's labor as he has occasion for. Every man thus lives by
    exchanging, or becomes in some measure a merchant, and the society itself grows to be what
    is properly a commercial society.But when the division of labor first began to take place, this power of exchanging must
    frequently have been very much clogged and embarrassed in its operations. One man, we
    shall suppose, has more of a certain commodity than he himself has occasion for, while
    another has less. The former consequently would be glad to dispose of, and the latter to
    purchase, a part of this superfluity. But if this latter should chance to have nothing
    that the former stands in need of, no exchange can be made between them. The butcher has
    more meat in his shop than he himself can consume, and the brewer and the baker would each
    of them be willing to purchase a part of it. But they have nothing to offer in exchange,
    except the different productions of their respective trades, and the butcher is already
    provided with all the bread and beer which he has immediate occasion for. No exchange can,
    in this case, be made between them. In order to avoid the inconvenience of such
    situations, every prudent man in every period of society, after the first establishment of
    the division of labor, must naturally have endeavored to manage his affairs in such a
    manner as to have at all times by him, besides the peculiar produce of his own industry, a
    certain quantity of some one commodity or other, such as he imagined few people would be
    likely to refuse in exchange for their produce....
  It is in this manner that money has
    become in all civilized nations the universal instrument of commerce, by the intervention
    of which goods of all kinds are bought and sold, or exchanged for one another....
  Book I, Chapter 5. Of the
    Real and Nominal Price of Commodities, or their Price in Labor, and their Price in Money: 
  EVERY man is rich or poor according to the degree in which he can afford to enjoy the
    necessaries, conveniences, and amusements of human life. But after the division of labor
    has once thoroughly taken place, it is but a very small part of these with which a man's
    own labor can supply him. The far greater part of them he must derive from the labor of
    other people, and he must be rich or poor according to the quantity of that labor which he
    can command, or which he can afford to purchase. The value of any commodity, therefore, to
    the person who possesses it, and who means not to use or consume it himself, but to
    exchange it for other commodities, is equal to the quantity of labor which it enables him
    to purchase or command. Labor, therefore, is the real measure of the exchangeable value of
    all commodities....The real price of everything, what everything really costs to the man who wants to
    acquire it, is the toil and trouble of acquiring it. What everything is really worth to
    the man who has acquired it, and who wants to dispose of it or exchange it for something
    else, is the toil and trouble which it can save to himself, and which it can impose upon
    other people. What is bought with money or with goods is purchased by labor as much as
    what we acquire by the toil of our own body. That money or those goods indeed save us this
    toil.....
  Book I, Chapter 6. Of the
    Component Parts of the Price of Commodities: 
  IN that early and rude state of society
    which precedes both the accumulation of stock and the appropriation of land, the
    proportion between the quantities of labor necessary for acquiring different objects seems
    to be the only circumstance which can afford any rule for exchanging them for one another.
    If among a nation of hunters, for example, it usually costs twice the labor to kill a
    beaver which it does to kill a deer, one beaver should naturally exchange for or be worth
    two deer. It is natural that what is usually the produce of two days' or two hours' labor,
    should be worth double of what is usually the produce of one day's or one hour's labor. If
    the one species of labor should be more severe than the other, some allowance will
    naturally be made for this superior hardship; and the produce of one hour's labor in the
    one way may frequently exchange for that of two hours' labor in the other.....
  As soon as stock has accumulated in the hands of particular persons, some of them will
    naturally employ it in setting to work industrious people, whom they will supply with
    materials and subsistence, in order to make a profit by the sale of their work, or by what
    their labor adds to the value of the materials. In exchanging the complete manufacture
    either for money, for labor, or for other goods, over and above what may be sufficient to
    pay the price of the materials, and the wages of the workmen, something must be given for
    the profits of the undertaker of the work who hazards his stock in this adventure. The
    value which the workmen add to the materials, therefore, resolves itself in this ease into
    two parts, of which the one pays their wages, the other the profits of their employer upon
    the whole stock of materials and wages which he advanced....In this state of things, the whole produce of labor does not always belong to the
    laborer. He must in most cases share it with the owner of the stock which employs him.
    Neither is the quantity of labor commonly employed in acquiring or producing any
    commodity, the only circumstance which can regulate the quantity which it ought commonly
    to purchase, command, or exchange for. An additional quantity, it is evident, must be due
    for the profits of the stock which advanced the wages and furnished the materials of that
    labor....
  The real value of all the different component parts of price, it must be
    observed, is measured by the quantity of labor which they can, each of them, purchase or
    command. Labor measures the value not only of that part of price which resolves itself
    into labor, but of that which resolves itself into rent, and of that which resolves itself
    into profit. In every society the price of every commodity finally resolves itself into
    some one or other, or all of those three parts; and in every improved society, all the
    three enter more or less, as component parts, into the price of the far greater part of
    commodities.....
  Book I, Chapter 7. Of the
    Natural and Market Price of Commodities: 
  THERE is in every society or neighborhood an ordinary
    or average rate both of wages and profit in every different employment of labor and
    stock. This rate is naturally regulated, as I shall show hereafter, partly by the
    general circumstances of the society, their riches or poverty, their advancing,
    stationary, or declining condition; and partly by the particular nature of each
    employment. There is likewise in every society or neighborhood an ordinary or average
      rate of rent, which is regulated too, as I shall show hereafter, partly by the general
    circumstances of the society or neighborhood in which the land is situated, and partly by
    the natural or improved fertility of the land. These ordinary or average rates may be
    called the natural rates of wages, profit, and rent, at the time and place in which
    they commonly prevail. When the price of any commodity is neither more nor less than what
    is sufficient to pay the rent of the land, the wages of the labor, and the profits of the
    stock employed in raising, preparing, and bringing it to market, according to their
    natural rates, the commodity is then sold for what may be called its natural price. Though
    the price, therefore, which leaves him this profit is not always the lowest at which a
    dealer may sometimes sell his goods, it is the lowest at which he is likely to sell them
    for any considerable time; at least where there is perfect liberty, or where he may change
    his trade as often as he pleases. The actual price at which any commodity is commonly sold is called its market
      price. It may either be above, or below, or exactly the same with its natural price.
    The market price of every particular commodity is regulated by the proportion between the
    quantity which is actually brought to market, and the demand of those who are willing to
    pay the natural price of the commodity, or the whole value of the rent, labor, and profit,
    which must be paid in order to bring it thither. When the quantity of any commodity which
    is brought to market falls short of the effectual demand, all those who are willing to pay
    the whole value of the rent, wages, and profit, which must be paid in order to bring it
    thither, cannot be supplied with the quantity which they want. Rather than want it
    altogether, some of them will be willing to give more. A competition will
    immediately begin among them, and the market price will rise more or less above the
    natural price, according as either the greatness of the deficiency, or the wealth and
    wanton luxury of the competitors, happen to animate more or less the eagerness of the
    competition.When the quantity brought to market exceeds the effectual demand, it cannot be all sold
    to those who are willing to pay the whole value of the rent, wages, and profit, which must
    be paid in order to bring it thither. Some part must be sold to those who are willing to
    pay less, and the low price which they give for it must reduce the price of the whole. The
    market price will sink more or less below the natural price, according as the greatness of
    the excess increases more or less the competition of the sellers, or according as it
    happens to be more or less important to them to get immediately rid of the commodity. When
    the quantity brought to market is just sufficient to supply the effectual demand, and no
    more, the market price naturally comes to be either exactly, or as nearly as can be judged
    of, the same with the natural price. The whole quantity upon hand can be disposed of for
    this price, and cannot be disposed of for more. The competition of the different dealers
    obliges them all to accept of this price, but does not oblige them to accept of less.Such fluctuations affect both the value and the rate either of wages or of profit,
    according as the market happens to be either overstocked or understocked with commodities
    or with labor; with work done, or with work to be done. But though the market price of
    every particular commodity is in this manner continually gravitating, if one may say so,
    towards the natural price, yet sometimes particular accidents, sometimes natural causes,
    and sometimes particular regulations of police, may, in many commodities, keep up the
    market price, for a long time together, a good deal above the natural price.When by an increase in the effectual demand, the market price of some particular
    commodity happens to rise a good deal above the natural price, those who employ their
    stocks in supplying that market are generally careful to conceal this change. If it was
    commonly known, their great profit would tempt so many new rivals to employ their stocks
    in the same way that, the effectual demand being fully supplied, the market price would
    soon be reduced to the natural price, and perhaps for some time even below it. If the
    market is at a great distance from the residence of those who supply it, they may
    sometimes be able to keep the secret for several years together, and may so long enjoy
    their extraordinary profits without any new rivals. Secrets of this kind, however, it must
    be acknowledged, can seldom be long kept; and the extraordinary profit can last very
    little longer than they are kept.A monopoly granted either to an individual or to a trading company has the same
    effect as a secret in trade or manufactures. The monopolists, by keeping the market
    constantly understocked, by never fully supplying the effectual demand, sell their
    commodities much above the natural price, and raise their emoluments, whether they consist
    in wages or profit, greatly above their natural rate. The price of monopoly is upon every
    occasion the highest which can be got. The natural price, or the price of free
    competition, on the contrary, is the lowest which can be taken, not upon every occasion,
    indeed, but for any considerable time together. The one is upon every occasion the highest
    which can be squeezed out of the buyers, or which, it is supposed, they will consent to
    give: the other is the lowest which the sellers can commonly afford to take, and at the
    same time continue their business.The exclusive privileges of corporations, statutes of apprenticeship, and all those
    laws which restrain, in particular employments, the competition to a smaller number than
    might otherwise go into them, have the same tendency, though in a less degree. They are a
    sort of enlarged monopolies, and may frequently, for ages together, and in whole classes
    of employments, keep up the market price of particular commodities above the natural
    price, and maintain both the wages of the labor and the profits of the stock employed
    about them somewhat above their natural rate. Such enhancements of the market price may
    last as long as the regulations of police which give occasion to them.... 
  Book I, Chapter 8. Of
    the Wages of Labor: 
  THE produce of labor constitutes the natural recompense or wages
    of labor. In that original state of things, which precedes both the appropriation of land
    and the accumulation of stock, the whole produce of labor belongs to the laborer. He has
    neither landlord nor master to share with him. Had this state continued, the wages of
    labor would have augmented with all those improvements in its productive powers to which
    the division of labor gives occasion. All things would gradually have become cheaper. They
    would have been produced by a smaller quantity of labor; and as the commodities produced
    by equal quantities of labor would naturally in this state of things be exchanged for one
    another, they would have been purchased likewise with the produce of a smaller quantity.
    But this original state of things, in which the laborer enjoyed the whole produce of his
    own labor, could not last beyond the first introduction of the appropriation of land and
    the accumulation of stock. It was at an end, therefore, long before the most considerable
    improvements were made in the productive powers of labor, and it would be to no purpose to
    trace further what might have been its effects upon the recompense or wages of labor. As
    soon as land becomes private property, the landlord demands a share of almost all the
    produce which the laborer can either raise, or collect from it. His rent makes the first
    deduction from the produce of the labor which is employed upon land.Masters are always and everywhere in a sort of tacit, but constant and uniform
    combination, not to raise the wages of labor above their actual rate. To violate this
    combination is everywhere a most unpopular action, and a sort of reproach to a master
    among his neighbors and equals. Masters, too, sometimes enter into particular combinations
    to sink the wages of labor even below this rate. These are always conducted with the
    utmost silence and secrecy, till the moment of execution, and when the workmen yield, as
    they sometimes do, without resistance, though severely felt by them, they are never heard
    of by other people. Such combinations, however, are frequently resisted by a contrary
    defensive combination of the workmen; who sometimes too, without any provocation of this
    kind, combine of their own accord to raise the price of their labor.....
  A man must always
    live by his work, and his wages must at least be sufficient to maintain him. They must
    even upon most occasions be somewhat more; otherwise it would be impossible for him to
    bring up a family, and the race of such workmen could not last beyond the first
    generation.... When the landlord, annuitant, or monied man, has a greater revenue than what he judges
    sufficient to maintain his own family, he employs either the whole or a part of the
    surplus in maintaining one or more menial servants. Increase this surplus, and he will
    naturally increase the number of those servants. When an independent workman, such as a
    weaver or shoemaker, has got more stock than what is sufficient to purchase the materials
    of his own work, and to maintain himself till he can dispose of it, he naturally employs
    one or more journeymen with the surplus, in order to make a profit by their work. Increase
    this surplus, and he will naturally increase the number of his journeymen. The demand for
    those who live by wages, therefore, necessarily increases with the increase of the revenue
    and stock of every country, and cannot possibly increase without it. The increase of
    revenue and stock is the increase of national wealth....
  Is this improvement in the circumstances of the lower ranks of the people to be
    regarded as an advantage or as an inconvenience to the society? The answer seems at first
    sight abundantly plain. Servants, laborers, and workmen of different kinds, make up the
    far greater part of every great political society. But what improves the circumstances of
    the greater part can never be regarded as an inconvenience to the whole. No society can
    surely be flourishing and happy, of which the far greater part of the members are poor and
    miserable. It is but equity, besides, that they who feed, clothe, and lodge the whole body
    of the people, should have such a share of the produce of their own labor as to be
    themselves tolerably well fed, clothed, and lodged.The liberal reward of labor, as it encourages the propagation, so it increases the
    industry of the common people. The wages of labor are the encouragement of industry,
    which, like every other human quality, improves in proportion to the encouragement it
    receives. A plentiful subsistence increases the bodily strength of the laborer, and the
    comfortable hope of bettering his condition, and of ending his days perhaps in ease and
    plenty, animates him to exert that strength to the utmost. Where wages are high,
    accordingly, we shall always find the workmen more active, diligent, and expeditious than
    where they are low.
  Book I, Chapter 10. Of
    Wages and Profit in the different Employments of Labor and Stock: 
  THE policy of
    Europe, by not leaving things at perfect liberty, occasions other inequalities of much
    greater importance. It does this chiefly in the three following ways. First, by
    restraining the competition in some employments to a smaller number than would otherwise
    be disposed to enter into them; Second, by increasing it in others beyond what it
    naturally would be; and, Third, by obstructing the free circulation of labor and
    stock, both from employment to employment and from place to place.First, the policy of Europe occasions a very important inequality in the whole of
    the advantages and disadvantages of the different employments of labor and stock, by
    restraining the competition in some employments to a smaller number than might otherwise
    be disposed to enter into them. The exclusive privileges of corporations, or guilds, are
    the principal means it makes use of for this purpose. The property which every man has in
    his own labor, as it is the original foundation of all other property, so it is the most
    sacred and inviolable. The patrimony of a poor man lies in the strength and dexterity of
    his hands; and to hinder him from employing this strength and dexterity of his hands; and
    to hinder him from employing this strength and dexterity in what manner he thinks proper
    without injury to his neighbor is a plain violation of this most sacred property. It is a
    manifest encroachment upon the just liberty both of the workman and of those who might be
    disposed to employ him. As it hinders the one from working at what he thinks proper, so it
    hinders the others from employing whom they think proper....
  The pretense that corporations
    are necessary for the better government of the trade is without any foundation. The real
    and effectual discipline which is exercised over a workman is not that of his corporation,
    but that of his customers. It is the fear of losing their employment which restrains his
    frauds and corrects his negligence. An exclusive corporation necessarily weakens the force
    of this discipline. Second, the policy of Europe, by increasing the competition in some employments
    beyond what it naturally would be, occasions another inequality of an opposite kind in the
    whole of the advantages and disadvantages of the different employments of labor and
    stock....
  In the professions, such as law and medicine, if an equal proportion of people
    were educated at the public expense, the competition would soon be so great as to sink
    very much their pecuniary reward. It might then not be worth any man's while to educate
    his son to either of those professions at his own expense.... Third, the policy of Europe, by obstructing the free circulation of labor and stock
    both from employment to employment, and from place to place, occasions in some cases a
    very inconvenient inequality in the whole of the advantages and disadvantages of their
    different employments....
  Whatever obstructs the free circulation of labor from one
    employment to another obstructs that of stock likewise; the quantity of stock which can be
    employed in any branch of business depending very much upon that of the labor which can be
    employed in it. Corporation laws, however, give less obstruction to the free circulation
    of stock from one place to another than to that of labor. It is everywhere much easier for
    a wealthy merchant to obtain the privilege of trading in a town corporate, than for a poor
    artificer to obtain that of working in it....
  Book I, Chapter 11. Effects
    of the Progress of Improvement upon the Real Price of Manufactures: 
  It is the
    natural effect of improvement, however, to diminish gradually the real price of almost all
    manufactures. That of the manufacturing workmanship diminishes, perhaps, in all of them
    without exception. In consequence of better machinery, of greater dexterity, and of a more
    proper division and distribution of work, all of which are the natural effects of
    improvement, a much smaller quantity of labor becomes requisite for executing any
    particular piece of work, and though, in consequence of the flourishing circumstances of
    the society, the real price of labor should rise very considerably, yet the great
    diminution of the quantity will generally much more than compensate the greatest rise
    which can happen in the price....
  But in all cases in which the real price of the rude
    materials either does not rise at all, or does not rise very much, that of the
    manufactured commodity sinks very considerably.Every improvement in the circumstances of the society tends either directly or
    indirectly to raise the real rent of land, to increase the real wealth of the landlord,
    his power of purchasing the labor, or the produce of the labor of other people. The
    extension of improvement and cultivation tends to raise it directly. The landlord's share
    of the produce necessarily increases with the increase of the produce..... 
  Every increase
    in the real wealth of the society, every increase in the quantity of useful labor employed
    within it, tends indirectly to raise the real rent of land. A certain proportion of this
    labor naturally goes to the land. A greater number of men and cattle are employed in its
    cultivation, the produce increases with the increase of the stock which is thus employed
    in raising it, and the rent increases with the produce.
  Source; From: Adam Smith, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations,
    2 Vols., Everyman's Library (London: Dent & Sons, 1904), Vol. I, passim. Scanned and organized by Jerome S. Arkenberg, Cal. State Fullerton. 
  This text is part of the Internet
    Modern History Sourcebook. The Sourcebook is a collection of public domain and
    copy-permitted texts for introductory level classes in modern European and World history. 
 Unless otherwise indicated the specific electronic form of the document is copyright.
  Permission is granted for electronic copying, distribution in print form for educational
  purposes and personal use. If you do reduplicate the document, indicate the source. No
  permission is granted for commercial use of the Sourcebook. 
 Paul Halsall, January 1999