| Medieval Sourcebook: Niccolò Machiavelli (1469-1527):
 Republics and Monarchies, Excerpt from Discourses I, 55
 
  Public affairs are easily managed in a city where the body of the
              people is not corrupt; and where equality exists, there no principality can be
              established; nor can a republic be established where there is no equality Having sufficiently discussed the subject as to what is to be hoped and feared for
              states that are corrupt, it seems to me not amiss now to examine a resolution of the
              Senate of Rome in relation to the vow which Camillus had made, to give the tenth part of
              the booty taken from the Veienti to Apollo. These spoils having fallen into the hands of
              the Roman people, and there being no other way of having a correct account of it, the
              Roman Senate issued an edict that every one should bring to the public treasury one tenth
              part of the booty he had received. And although this decree was not carried into effect,
              the Senate having devised other ways and means for satisfying Apollo and the people,
              nevertheless we can see from that resolution how entirely the Senate trusted in the
              honesty of the people; and how confident they were that no one would fail to return
              exactly what had been ordered by that edict. And on the other hand we see how the people
              never for a moment thought of evading it in any way by giving less than what they ought to
              give, and how they preferred rather to relieve themselves of this imposition by open
              demonstrations of indignation. This example, together with the many others heretofore
              cited, proves how much probity and religion these people had, and how much good there was
              to be hoped for from them. And truly, where this probity does not exist, no good is to be
              expected, as in fact it is vain to look for anything good from those countries which we
              see nowadays so corrupt, as is the case above all others with Italy. France and Spain also
              have their share of corruption, and if we do not see so many disorders and troubles in
              those countries as is the case daily in Italy, it is not so much owing to the goodness of
              their people, in which they are greatly deficient, as to the fact that they have each a
              king who keeps them united not only by his virtue, but also by the institutions of those
              kingdoms, which are as yet preserved pure.  In Germany alone do we see that probity and religion still exist largely amongst the
              people, in consequence of which many republics exist there in the full enjoyment of
              liberty, observing their laws in such manner that no one from within or without could
              venture upon an attempt to master them. And in proof that the ancient virtue still
              prevails there in great part, I will cite an example similar to that given above of the
              Senate and people of Rome. When these republics have occasion to spend any considerable
              amount of money for public account, their magistrates or councils, who have authority in
              these matters, impose upon all the inhabitants a tax of one or two per cent of their
              possessions. When such a resolution has been passed according to the laws of the country,
              every citizen presents himself before the collectors of this impost, and after having
              taken an oath to pay the just amount, deposits in a strong-box provided for the purpose
              the sum which according to his conscience he ought to pay, without any one's witnessing
              what he pays. From this we may judge of the extent of the probity and religion that still
              exist amongst those people. And we must presume that every one pays the true amount, for
              if this were not the case the impost would not yield the amount intended according to the
              estimates based upon former impositions; the fraud would thus be discovered, and other
              means would be employed to collect the amount required. This honesty is the more to be
              admired as it is so very rare that it is found only in that country; and this results from
              two causes. The one is, that the Germans have no great commerce with their neighbours, few
              strangers coming amongst them, and they rarely visiting foreign countries, but being
              content to remain at home and to live on what their country produces, and to clothe
              themselves with the wool from their own flocks, which takes away all occasion for intimate
              intercourse with strangers and all opportunity of corruption. Thus they have been
              prevented from adopting either French, Spanish or Italian customs, and these nations are
              the great corrupters of the world. The other cause is, that those republics which have
              thus preserved their political existence uncorrupted do not permit any of their citizens
              to be or to live in the manner of gentlemen, but rather maintain amongst them a perfect
              equality, and are the most decided enemies of the lords and gentlemen that exist in the
              country; so that if by chance any of them fall into their hands, they kill them, as being
              the chief promoters of all corruption and troubles.  And to explain more clearly what is meant by the term gentlemen, I say that those are
              called gentlemen who live idly upon the proceeds of their extensive possessions, without
              devoting themselves to agriculture or any other useful pursuit to gain a living. Such men
              are pernicious to any country or republic, but more pernicious even than these are such as
              have, besides their other possessions, castles which they command, and subjects who obey
              them. This class of men abound in the kingdom of Naples, in the Roman territory, in the
              Romagna, in Lombardy; whence it is that no republic has ever been able to exist in those
              countries, nor have they been able to preserve any regular political existence, for that
              class of men are everywhere enemies of all civil government. And to attempt the
              establishment of a republic in a country so constituted would be impossible. The only way
              to establish any kind of order there is to found a monarchical government; for where the
              body of the people is so thoroughly corrupt that the laws are powerless for restraint, it
              becomes necessary to establish some superior power which with a royal hand, and with full
              and absolute powers, may put a curb upon the excessive ambition and corruption of the
              powerful. This is verified by the example of Tuscany, where in a comparatively small
              extent of territory there have for a long time existed three republics, Florence, Siena
              and Lucca; and although the other cities of this territory are in a measure subject to
              these, yet we see that in spirit and by their institutions they maintain, or attempt to
              maintain, their liberty; all of which is due to the fact that there are in that country no
              lords possessing castles, and exceedingly few or no gentlemen. On the contrary, there is
              such a general equality that it would be easy for any man of sagacity, well versed in the
              ancient forms of civil government, to introduce a republic there; but the misfortunes of
              that country have been so great that up to the present time no man has arisen who has had
              the power and ability to do so.  We may then draw the following conclusion from what has been said: that if any one
              should wish to establish a republic in a country where there are many gentlemen, he will
              not succeed until he has destroyed them all; and whoever desires to establish a kingdom or
              principality where liberty and equality prevail, will equally fail, unless he withdraws
              from that general equality a number of the boldest and most ambitious spirits, and makes
              gentlemen of them, not merely in name but in fact, by giving to them castles and
              possessions, as well as money and subjects; so that surrounded by these he may be able to
              maintain his power, and that by his support they may satisfy their ambition, and the
              others may be constrained to submit to that yoke to which force alone has been able to
              subject them. And as in this way definite relations will be established between the ruler
              and his subjects, they will be maintained in their respective ranks. But to establish a
              republic in a country better adapted to a monarchy, or a monarchy where a republic would
              be more suitable, requires a man of rare genius and power, and therefore out of the many
              that have attempted it but few have succeeded; for the greatness of the enterprise
              frightens men so that they fail even in the very beginning. Perhaps the opinion which I
              have expressed, that a republic cannot be established where there are gentlemen, may seem
              to be contradicted by the experience of the Venetian republic, in which none but gentlemen
              could attain to any rank or public employment. And yet this example is in no way opposed
              to my theory, for the gentlemen of Venice are so more in name than in fact; for they have
              no great revenues from estates, their riches being founded upon commerce and a movable
              property, and moreover none of them have castles or jurisdiction over subjects, but the
              name of gentleman is only a title of dignity and respect, and is in no way based upon the
              things that gentlemen enjoy in other countries. And as all other republics have different
              classes under different names, so Venice is divided into gentlemen and commonalty, and the
              former have all the offices and honours, from which the latter are entirely excluded; and
              this distribution causes no disorders in that republic, for the reasons elsewhere given.
              Let republics, then, be established where equality exists, and, on the contrary,
              principalities where great inequality prevails; otherwise the governments will lack proper
              proportions and have but little durability.  
 Source. The Historical, Political and Diplomatic Writings of Niccolò Machiavelli,
              trans. C. E. Detmold, 4 vols, Boston 1882. Extract from `Discourses' (I, 55). 
 This text is part of the Internet
              Medieval Source Book. The Sourcebook is a collection of public domain and
              copy-permitted texts related to medieval and Byzantine history.  Unless otherwise indicated the specific electronic form of the document is copyright.
              Permission is granted for electronic copying, distribution in print form for educational
              purposes and personal use. If you do reduplicate the document, indicate the source. No
              permission is granted for commercial use.  © Paul Halsall, October 1998 halsall@fordham.edu
 
 
 The Internet History Sourcebooks Project is located at the History Department of  Fordham University, New York. The Internet
  Medieval Sourcebook, and other medieval components of the project, are located at
  the Fordham University Center
    for Medieval Studies.The IHSP recognizes the contribution of Fordham University, the
  Fordham University History Department, and the Fordham Center for Medieval Studies in
  providing web space and server support for the project. The IHSP is a project independent of Fordham University.  Although the IHSP seeks to follow all applicable copyright law, Fordham University is not
  the institutional owner, and is not liable as the result of any legal action.
 © Site Concept and Design: Paul Halsall  created 26 Jan 1996: latest revision 20 Oct 2025  [CV]
   |